Laserfiche WebLink
landscaping, trash collection, utilities, and other infrastructure, parks and green spaces, parking � <br />lot layouts and landscaping, and coordinated signage. <br />��.�1 In addition to these provisions the developer has outlined ways in which the proj ect will <br />achieve many of the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standards for <br />"Green" Building and site design. Refer to the attached memo from Rottlund Companies dated <br />September 28,2004. <br />I�_� I�AN'N' ��N� L_.l1 �l�:�l� & ! L� I I�►� �[ Whv Roseville i4 ,�p�o� <br />Redevelopment Within Twin Lakes. <br />! 1. I In the mid 1980's, the City of Roseville adopted a long term policy (and retains it in the current <br />Comprehensive Plan) to remove trucking and industrial uses from the east side of 35 W, in order <br />to create a more complementaryneighbor to adjacent, northern and eastern residential areas. <br />� �,� The City of Roseville (by policy) owns no land within the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area <br />and must rely on the market and private sector development companies and land owners to <br />reclaim and construct the new Twin Lakes neighborhood. The Community Development <br />Department has been directedto market the redevelopmentof Twin Lakes. Staff has discussed <br />and promoted the Twin Lakes area to the maj ority of the top development companies in the <br />Twin Cities over the past 6-8 years. This proposal from the private sector (with over half the <br />land owned or controlled by the developers) is the most comprehensive and coordinated <br />redevelopmentproposed during that time. <br />I i.3 Without a comprehensive and coordinated approach, the existing industrial zoning and uses <br />may remain or be slowly (and individually) redeveloped, making neighborhoodwide <br />redevelopment impossible. The consistent response from the development community is that it <br />is very challenging (and a higher risk) to invest and redevelop higher quality uses (on a parcel <br />by parcel basis) adj acent to a blighted truck terminal. <br />� I.� The cost of creating or acquiring new industrial and truck terminal sites that meet all current <br />operational and regulatory requirements is more expensive than maintaining existing <br />"grandfathered industrial sites. Therefore, the existing sites are valuable. Converting them to <br />office, retail, and housing uses requires significant more investment than (despite their blighted <br />appearance and despite the pollution generated there) building on a third ring suburban vacant <br />site. <br />��.� Redevelopment of 80 blighted acres by removing partially vacant trucking and truck terminal <br />warehousing will improve the environmental and visual quality of the County Road C and <br />Cleveland entry to Roseville and will spur future redevelopment to the east and north. <br />1 l.b Redevelopmentwill reduce trucking as an active land use within 80 acres and thereby will <br />reduce trucking activities on local streets. <br />1 I� Redevelopment will improve the environment by removing or encapsulating pollutants and <br />� <br />� <br />PF3595 - R CA Concept Plan and PrelimPlat Approval - 102504 Page 26 <br />