2004_1025_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2. Including both existing and proposed units and sites, computation of inside building area sizes � need not include decks, patios, stoops, steps, accessory structures, or porches and basements, unless they are habitable or occupied space. The ordinance states that this applies in the overlay district. According to the ordinance, the Overlay district: ( or shoreland district) 1016.12: WATER MANAGEMENT OVERLAY DISTRICTS: A. Creation: The Water Management Overlay I?i�tri�t hereby created and is divided inCq �.hc following subdis4ricts as shown on the Official Zoning Map or an attachment thereto: the ShOrelarid D1St11Ct, the Wetland Protection District, and the Storm Water District. 1. Shoreland District: All land meeting the definition of ShOYelariC� adj acent to the public waters listed in Section 1016.13 of this Chapter. From definitions section of ordinance SHORELAND: Land located within one thousand feet (1,000') from the ordinary high water level of the lakes classified in section 1016.13 of this chapter. I have not analyzed how this development but his needs to be done. I do know that the developer stated that the development has 70% hard surface with only 30% of th� land remaining as op�n space. The ordinance states in G-3 that 3. Open Space Requirements: �lanued unit developments within shoreland districts shall contain open space meeting all of the following criteria: a. At least fi$y percent (50%0) of the total project area shall be preserved as open space. (Dwelli� units or sites, road r�� of way, l�pd eovered by r�d �� parklrig areaS, 01' StrUCtUreS, except water-oriented accessory structures or facilities, are developed areas and shall not be included in the computation of minimum open sp�ce); This means that the developmentas proposed is not within the requirements of the ordinance. Finally, the ordinance states in section 101"7.17 section G that: G. Height of Structures: All structures in residential districts, except steeples and chimneys from churches a�d ��titn#ie�l uses, sha� sot exceed thirty �� (30') in height. Since I am doubtful that a four story residential structure is less than 30 f�t in height, I am doubtful that the develop meets this portion of the ordinance. Based on these deviations from the ordinance, I believe that we have no choice but to reject the proposal as it stands. Lastly, I do not understand the use of a B-6 zone for the underlying zoning. � }