My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_1115_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_1115_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 2:56:55 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:45:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 2 <br />5. For the Public Works and Transportation Commissioners, do you think <br />your commission could or should address environmental issues not currently <br />being handled by the Parks and Recreation or Planning Commissions? <br />Why or why not? <br />6. Is there any other information you would like to give the City <br />Council about Roseville's citizen advisory commissions? <br />In regards to the potential of developing an Environmental Committee... Yes, many of these issues are covered in <br />part by P& R and PW & T commissions. I think presenting a matrix of where the interests intersect, along with <br />other city functions, could help clarify whether an expansion to another commission is necessary. An <br />Environmental Committee runs the risk of being more policitized that any other city commission. <br />Thanks for asking my opinion. I always have one! <br />--�- Sarah Brodt Lenz <br />Parks and Recreation Commissioner <br />L L r i �r'�(�(�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.