My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_1122_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_1122_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 9:11:41 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:46:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting —11/08/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 10 <br />regarding this Request for Council Action. Mr. Beets noted Certain Locations <br />that several years ago, MnDOT turned back to Ramsey <br />County the segment of Rice Street (Trunk Highway 49) <br />from I-694 to University Avenue; and that as a result, the <br />County acquired the operation and maintenance <br />responsibilities for traffic control signals along that section <br />of Rice Street. With that turn back and subsequent <br />jurisdiction, new maintenance agreements needed to be <br />executed for several intersections: <br />A reement # Intersection Parties to A reement <br />PW 2003-21 at County Road C Ramsey County, Cities of Little <br />Canada and Roseville <br />PW 2003-22 at County Road B-2 Ramsey County, Ciries of Little <br />Canada and Roseville <br />PW 2003-23 at Minnesota Street Ramsey County, Ciries of Little <br />Canada and Roseville <br />PW 2003-24 at County Road B Ramsey County, Cities of Little <br />Canada, Roseville and Ma lewood <br />PW 2003-26 at Roselawn Avenue Ramsey County, Cities of Roseville <br />and Ma lewood <br />PW 2003-27 at Larpenteur Avenue Ramsey County, Cities of Roseville <br />and Ma lewood <br />Councilmember Schroeder questioned whether the City had <br />a choice on this matter, noting that the signals were for <br />signal lights at County to County intersections. <br />City Engineer Debra Bloom responded that the City <br />historically pays for the electricity for the lights; <br />consideration may be given not to participate, was not sure <br />of potential repercussions; but offered to perform further <br />research. <br />Maschka moved, Schroeder seconded, tabling action on <br />approval of signal maintenance agreements numbers W <br />2003-21; PW 2003-22; PW 2003-23; PW 2003-24; PW <br />2003-26; and PW 2003-27 between the City of Roseville <br />and Ramsey County; and directed staff to provide further <br />research and information to the City Council at their <br />earliest convenience for future consideration. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Kough, Maschka, Ihlan and Klausing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.