Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting —11/08/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 32 <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Kough, Maschka and Klausing. <br />Nays: Ihlan. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that she would be voting <br />against the motion due to its restrictive nature, opining <br />more flexibility was needed. <br />Roll Call (Original Motion as Amended) <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Kough, Maschka and Klausing. <br />Nays: Ihlan. <br />Public Notice <br />Further discussion ensued regarding how to proceed with <br />the public notice of the public hearing, if the Council so <br />desired to provide that notice. <br />City Manager Beets addressed the notice process as it <br />related to the next available edition of the City's official <br />newspaper, the Roseville Review, noting that the next <br />available issue would be November 16; in order to <br />accommodate the November 22, 2004 hearing date. <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that land-use hearing <br />requirements did not apply to this EAW petition hearing. <br />After further clarification from City Attorney Anderson, <br />Ihlan moved, Kough seconded, directing staff to provide <br />public notice in the Roseville Review for the November 16 <br />edition, and in any other available media sources or via <br />press releases, calling for any written comment regarding <br />the EAW, a copy of which is on file at City Hall; with all <br />written comment to be received by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, <br />November 19, 2004. <br />All written comment was to be directed to a specific <br />person, at a specific address to avoid confusion. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Kough, Maschka, Ihlan and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />