My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_1122_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_1122_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 9:11:41 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:46:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting —11/08/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 33 <br />8.b Consider Adopting a Resolution Amending the <br />Timeframes within the Contract Between the City of <br />Roseville and the Rottlund Companies in Light of the <br />EAW Petition <br />Maschka moved, Schroeder seconded, adoption of <br />Resolution No. 10259 entitled, "A Resolution Authorizing <br />Extension of Deadlines in the Contract for Exclusive <br />Negotiations between the City of Roseville, Minnesota <br />and the Rottlund Company, Inc., for the Twin Lakes <br />Redevelopment Area." <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned language in Section 3 of <br />the resolution entitled, "Authorizations," as it related to <br />extending the deadline after Rottlund had received concept <br />plan approval. Councilmember Ihlan interpreted this <br />language to provide an indefinite extension to the Contract <br />for Exclusive Negotiations with Rottlund Homes. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned: <br />1) Why extend at all? <br />2) How does this extension serve the best interest of <br />the City? <br />Mayor Klausing questioned what Councilmember Ihlan <br />proposed. <br />Councilmember Ihlan declined any proposal; referencing <br />Page 5 of the Contract for Exclusive Negotiations, where <br />the developer responsibilities were outlined, with <br />provisions regarding termination if steps were not met; <br />and opined that only the December 31, 2004 deadline <br />should be extended, not the March 31, 2004 deadline, <br />further opining that it was not in the City's best interest to <br />extend the dates on a blanket basis. <br />City Manager Beets reviewed the contract deadlines that <br />were in place, related to Council direction and terms — <br />with key dates of September 30, 2004; December 31, <br />2004; and march 31, 2004; opining that without extending <br />the deadlines, it would make it difficult for the parties to <br />Resolution 10259 <br />Amending the <br />Timeframes within <br />the Contract <br />Between the City of <br />Roseville and the <br />Rottlund <br />Companies in Light <br />of the EAW <br />Petition <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.