My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_1206_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_1206_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 4:35:22 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:46:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting —11/22/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 18 <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned whether this proposed use was <br />consistent with current underlying zoning. <br />Mr. Paschke responded affirmatively, noting interior and exterior <br />storage would be consistent under a Conditional Use Permit <br />(CUP), but that due to the moratorium, staff was not able to <br />process a CUP. <br />Councilmember Ihlan, in reviewing her original vote against the <br />moratorium, questioned whether the Council's intent in adopting <br />the language of the moratorium to allow interim uses that may <br />violate current or future zoning. <br />Councilmember Maschka noted that such instances were the <br />purpose of interim use permits. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that the use was supported by City Code, and <br />that the moratorium allowed for a process, supported by City <br />Council, with the moratorium language specific to such cases. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that the Council needed to modify <br />language in Section 4.3 (Exceptions) of the moratorium to be <br />consistent with zoning code. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that staff would not process applications that <br />were not consistent or for uses that were not permitted, and this <br />application was consistent with the language in the moratorium. <br />Councilmember Schroeder sought clarification of the timeframe <br />for this use; opining that this use, from his personal standpoint, <br />was not an attractive, long-term use of property in a <br />redevelopment area. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that the CUP would determine if the use fit. <br />[8.1] Kough moved, Maschka seconded, adoption of Resolution <br />No. 10263 entitled, "A Resolution Approving an Interim Use <br />Permit for Boaters Outlet, 1705 W County Road C(PF 3603)." <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Kough, Maschka, Ihlan and Klausing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.