My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_1206_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_1206_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 4:35:22 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:46:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting —11/22/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 19 <br />Nays: Schroeder. <br />City Manager Beets noted that Parks and Recreation Director <br />Brokke was now in attendance at the meeting, and at Council <br />discretion, the OVAL update and request for Council direction <br />could take place prior to the Twin Lakes issue. <br />Recess Recess <br />Mayor Klausing recessed the meeting at approximately 7:40 p.m. <br />and reconvened at 7:48 p.m. <br />11. OVAL Update; Request for Council Direction OVAL Update; <br />Mayor Klausing provided background information regarding Request for <br />actions to-date by staff and the City Council. Council Direction <br />Parks and Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke provided an <br />update to the Council and public, and results of recent engineers' <br />inspection and testing of the chiller system, completed on <br />November 17, 2004. Mr. Brokke recognized and thanked the <br />Midway Speed Skating Club for their financial contribution in <br />covering costs of the inspection. <br />Mr. Brokke briefly reviewed highlights of the inspection <br />summary report and processes used in the inspection. <br />Mr. Brokke cautioned the City Council and public that any <br />option chosen, short of a retube or replacement, would carry a <br />calculated risk. Mr. Brokke opined that, based upon research <br />and the engineering report, this calculated risk was worth taking <br />due to the high community use of the facility; increased revenue <br />generation as originally planned; and continuing education for <br />staff and the community with an asset that requires special skills <br />and knowledge to continue operation and trouble shooting as the <br />facility continues to age. <br />Discussion included clarification of tube locations, restrictions or <br />obstructions, and options for plugging or replacement; initial <br />design and current anticipated capacity level of the chiller unit; <br />efficiency of the chiller unit; age of unit and need for more <br />periodic inspections; using this inspection as a base-line, and <br />repeating the inspection next year off-season to determine the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.