Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />� <br />Chair Klausing asked if truck delivery (7/day) will increase from e�sting (no). <br />How much closer is new delivery to properiy line (120 to 140 feet)? Why is <br />building so close to residence on east? (Putting greens, greens and dining areas <br />are fixed, cannot move building closer and still maintain views). <br />6 Member Egli asked if the parking lot adjacent to Lake Street was set back 10 feet? <br />� Member Egli asked how the 37,500 s.f. compared to the competition in <br />g clubhouses? NIr. Bessinger said the Club House as proposed is mid-range in size. <br />9 <br />io <br />11 <br />12 <br />Member Egli asked if the special function entrance on the south had an additional <br />door? (Yes, for delivery of supplies only). <br />�3 Glen Morey, 223 1 Draper Ave., said he was pleased with the response by the <br />�4 Club, but concerned about how the City will manage the site, especially the 10% <br />�s expansion limit approvable by the staff. He recommended no further expansion <br />� 6 to the east side of the building. He was concerned about the swimming pool <br />�� conditional use permit amendment. He has not seen landscape plans or grading <br />1g plans, recommended that Council approval occur only after receipt of such plans. <br />�9 <br />2o Joe Olson asked the length of the building from east to west (no direct answer, <br />21 350 to 400 foot estimated by architect). <br />22 <br />23 Da�id Mueller, 2 115 Rosewood Lane, said a11 neighbors should have gotten <br />24 notice. Traffic from Fulton should have a signage/entrance on Cleveland, <br />2s directing traffic to the entry to NTidland Hills. The neighbors derive no benefit <br />26 from the Club. He asked how tall the building was from Midland Hills Road. <br />2� <br />2g <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />Cathy Croughan, 1961 Midland Hills, asked for details of the drainage to her <br />adjacent residential area and whether vegetation will be retained? <br />Ms. Croughan asked for details of how the pipe will be installed from the parking <br />area. (possibly a IO-foot wide trenched pipe then landscape restored). <br />7oe Olson, Roselawn and NTidland Hills Road, distributed written comments on <br />criteria for compatibility (attached to minutes). He expressed concern with <br />incompatibility of the clubhouse. He suggested that banquet use would increase <br />by 42%. He recommended no construction south of the west extension of north <br />Rosewood Lane and east of the line running along the east side of the club house <br />and along the east side of the driveway and parking to Fulham. He also <br />recommended a ban on outdoor audio systems and music; and that a member <br />must be responsible for each banquet function. <br />43 Cathy Croughan, 196 1 Midland Hills, said that an oversight was made on the <br />44 drawings, allowing no screening of the view from her home to the north and <br />4s northwest. The berm and plantings must e�tend further to cover this site. Being <br />46 adjacent to the club is a benefit, but the building will be large and close to homes, <br />Planning Commission Minutes, February 9, ZQQQ Page 4 of 1 Q <br />