2000_0313_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 11 12 13 14 1S 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 especially the "pariy end" of the building with its noise. Parking lot noise has not been addressed — could the club staff or off duty Roseville police monitor the parties, especially late night. The Planning Commission should preclude further eastward development toward the neighborhood. Ed Sucoff, Midland Hills Road, noted that the building is large (160 feet north to south). He compared buildings with this building. It is too large for a suburban site. He recommended: 1) No access from Midland Hills or Rosewood Lane. 2) The final landscape plan should be approved by the Council. 3) The final lighting plan should be approved by the Council. 4) Noise outside the building should be contained. The developer should submit a noise impact statement and an abatement plan (as per Code, Section 405) for the patios and the parking lot. 5) There is no grading landscaping lighting and future development plan. There is uncertainty about the ultimate use. He asked that the City postpone consideration until all plans are submitted. The landscaping and the activity stop at the properiy line not the building. Erli Chan, who lives at Rosewood and Midland Hills Drive, expressed concern with the visual and noise screening buffers from his house (house closest to the patio). He expressed concern with 10% administration amendment toward his properry (to the east). Ward Shendell provided a list of items that the Planning Commission had previously discussed. There being no further public comment, Chair Klausing closed the hearing. Chair Klausing explained the conditions that must be met to approve the CUP. He expressed concern about conditions placed on future proposals. He listed the concerns from neighbors as well as his concerns. 1�Totion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Klausing to approve the request by Midland Hills Country Club for a conditional use permit as submitted in the plans dated February 4 and February 9, 2000, and subject to the findings and conditions outlined in the staff report of February 9, 2000, as follows: l. The project as proposed meet the criteria required listed in Section 10 13 .0 1 D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance. The proposed project is a permitted conditional use as stipulated in Section 1004.02 C of the Rl, Single Family Residential District requirements and is consistent with the Roseville Comprehensive Plan. 2. Over the course of the past two months, staff has reviewed four specific site plans for the proposed clubhouse and site modifications. The development plan set, dated by the City as February 4, 2000, is considered the Master Concept Plan. All reviews and conditions specified below are based upon these plans. Planning Commission Minutes, February 9, 2000 Page 5 of 10