2000_0327_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5.6 Mr. Ed Sucoff expressed concern with the size of the structure and indicated he felt it was too large for a suburban site. He proposed conditions be placed on the project that required the landscape and parking lot lighting plans be approved by the City Council; that no access be allowed to Midland Hills Road or Rosewood Lane; that a noise impact study should be completed and an abatement plan created for the parking lot and patio areas; and that the Con-mission postpone consideration until final plans are complete. 5.7 Mr. Erli Chan expressed concern over the structure location, the buffer, and the administrative approval of a 10% change. 6.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 6.1 On February 9, 2000, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Midland Hills request. The Planning Commission reviewed the findings and following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted (6-O) to recommend approval of the request by Midland Hills Country Club for a conditional use permit, subject to the findings and 16 conditions listed in the staff report dated February 4, 2000 and subject to: • Condition 3.15 being changed to read: Minor changes to the Master Plan (less than 1,000 square feet in size) may be approved administratively. ( The Code currently allows an administrative approval for up to 10% of the building footprint) Condition 3.16 being changed to read: All future changes/additions to the site plan including structural additions over 1,000 square feet of the building footprint; off-street parking; or a swimming pool; or a tennis court, shall require an amendment to the CUP. Condition 3.17 being added to read: There shall be no amplified sound beyond the current practice of announcing tee times. 7.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION 7,1 By resolution approve (deny) the request by Midland Hills Country Club for a CUP to allow construction of a new 37,500 square foot clubhouse and other appropriate site modifications, based on *he findings outlined in Section 2.21 of the project report and subject to 16 conditions indicated in the project report dated March 13, 2000. PF3 178 — RCA (032700) Page 10 of 11