My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000_0410_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000
>
2000_0410_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 1:24:46 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:49:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
for a variance: <br />Findings: <br />1. The strict enforcement of the existing ordinance would not cause an undue hardship on the <br />applicant. Within the current lot coverage limitations, which have a rational basis in <br />providing additional buffer or separation between intensive land uses and abutting <br />properties, the applicant is still able to put the property to a number of reasonable uses. <br />2. There is insufficient unique circumstances present to warrant a variance for the proposed <br />use. <br />As submitted and as subsequently modified by the applicant, and in spite of the recently <br />adopted design and performance standards for uses within the Shopping Center Districts, <br />the proposed expanded use would negatively affect the character of the neighborhood due <br />to the proximity of the development to the residential properties abutting the subj ect <br />parcel; the intensity of the proposed use and orientation of the expansion toward the <br />residential neighborhood; and the traffic generated by the proposed expansion. <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the <br />City of Roseville, Minnesota, that the application to issue a Variance to allow the construction of <br />an additional 18,508 square feet of grocery retail, enclosed delivery, and enclosed trash area at the <br />Har Mar Mall is hereby denied. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member , and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted on the 10" day of <br />April, 2000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.