Laserfiche WebLink
Extract Of Minutes Of Meeting Of The <br />City Council Of The City Of Roseville <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly called held at the City Hall on Monday, the <br />10" April, 2000, at 6:30 P.M. <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />Resolution No. <br />Resolution Denying a Variance for <br />Bradley Operating Limited Partnership at Har Mar Mall (PF3194) <br />WHEREAS, Bradley Operating Limited Partnership, as owner of the Har Mar Mall, filed <br />an application for a variance from Section 1006.02C (Lot Coverage) and Section 1011.02 (Non- <br />conforming Uses: Existing Structures or Uses) of the Roseville City Code to a11ow the <br />construction of an additional 18,508 square feet of retail, enclosed delivery, and enclosed trash <br />area at the Har Mar Mall; and <br />WHEREAS, the application was accepted as complete on February 18, 2000; and <br />WHEREAS, after due notice the Roseville Planning Commission held a public hearing <br />regarding the variance application in accordance with state law and city ordinance on March 8, <br />2000, at which time oral and written testimony was presented by the applicant, its agents, <br />residents, and other interested persons, and; <br />WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 4-3 to <br />recommend that the City Council deny the variance after finding that the strict enforcement of the <br />existing ordinances would not cause an undue hardship on the applicant, and; <br />WHEREAS the City Council at its regular council meeting on March 27" received the <br />Planning Commission's recommendation, further written and oral testimony from the applicant <br />and other interested persons, and; <br />WHEREAS upon consideration of the application and supporting materials, the staff <br />report, and all other information constituting the record of this application, and upon further <br />deliberation, the Council voted 4-1 to deny the variance and directed the City Attorney to prepare <br />findings and this resolution as a contemporaneous record of the Council's decision, <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br />Minnesota, that it adopts and memorializes the following findings regarding the subject application <br />