My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000_0424_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000
>
2000_0424_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 3:24:10 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:49:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Current City policy requires that cost overruns in excess of 5% of the original contract amount be <br />approved by the Council. Not including the amount financed directly by property owners, the <br />overruns total $379,091.13 (18.72%). An overview of these overruns is as follows: <br />1. The construction of the outlet for Ramsey County McCarrons Park ponds $14,470.00 <br />was realigned at the request of St. Paul Waterworks. The new alignment <br />required additional clearing and grubbing which was not accounted for in the <br />original quantities. In addition, during the construction phase, we removed <br />additional trees at the re uest of residents. <br />2. During construction we discovered that there was existing material under the $73,b68.68 <br />realigned roadway that was not suitable for street subbase. It was also <br />necessa to install draintile for water infiltration to ensure a stable subbase. <br />3. It was necessary to install more as well as higher retaining walls, in areas $182,542.00 <br />where we were going to grade out yards. This was done at the request of <br />residents who did not want to have their yards sloped down to the street. The <br />quantity overruns were for both modular block and limestone walls. <br />4. When we were constructing North McCarrons we determined that there was $4,712.22 <br />not enough cover over the water-main. It was necessary to install additional <br />insulation over the watermain. <br />5. In working with the neighborhood during construction, residents requested $36,783.29 <br />that additional landscaping be installed. This consisted of additional trees, <br />shrubs, and da lilies. <br />6. In constructing the retaining walls it was necessary to disturb additional $19,410.99 <br />ground, since this was within people's yards, we restored the areas with sod. <br />We also had areas slated for native seeding that was sodded instead. <br />7. Additional driveway-removals and reconstruction was necessary as a part of $5,652.50 <br />the street construction <br />B, 2.1% is due to private work that is funded directly by property owners. $42,25 1.45 <br />T o t a 1 $379,491.13 <br />The overrun costs will be financed by the City's Utility Funds and Municipal State Aid account. <br />Staff recommendation: All necessary items have been completed in accordance with project <br />plans and specifications. Since all items have been completed as outlined in the policy regarding <br />final contract acceptance, staff recommends the City Council approve a resolution accepting the <br />work completed under 1997 Contract A and authorizing final payment of $53,033.08. The total <br />amount paid for 1997 Contract A, City Project P-97-03 is $2,731,979.28 <br />RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: <br />Approval of a resolution accepting the work completed under 1997 Contract A as outlined above, <br />star-tin-g the one-year warranty and authorizing final payment of $53,033.08. <br />Prepared by: Deb Bloom <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.