Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />lo <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />Thomas Paschke explained the height and measurement differences. <br />Chair Klausing explained the variance and requirements and his support for the <br />project because of undue hardships and that the project is an improvement to <br />health, safety and welfare. <br />Member Rhody explained the risk of tearing down structures. <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, Member Wilke seconded, to recommend <br />granting of the variance to allow the redevelopment of the parcel at 391 Owasso <br />Boulevard South with a single family residential home subj ect to the following <br />conditions: <br />1) The home to be constructed has a footprint not to exceed 1500 s.£; <br />2) The impervious surface is not to exceed 32% of the lot size and the <br />applicant shall work with city staff to attempt to reduce further the <br />impervious surface; <br />The Planning Commission recommends the granting of the variance based upon <br />the following findings: <br />1) The unique physical features of the property (i.e., the shape and <br />size of the lot) create a physical hardship; <br />2) The hardship is not the applicant's creation; <br />3) Property cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the <br />conditions permitted by ordinance, and, <br />4) If granted the variance will not impact the health, safety or <br />general welfare of the community. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />