Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />� <br />s <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />ls <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />Member Cunningham agreed with Member Mulder's reasoning. <br />Motion: Member Wilke moved, Member Egli seconded, to table <br />consideration of Planning File 3211, request by Kenneth Wieden for <br />Variance, to the June 14, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. <br />Ayes: 3, Wilke, Egli, Klausing <br />Nays: 4, Cunningham, Rhody, Gl�on, Mulder <br />Motion defeated 3-4. <br />Vote on ori�inal moHon to recommend granting of the requested <br />variance, based on findings and conditions outlined. <br />Ayes: 3, Wilke, Egli, Klausing <br />Nays: 4, Cunningham, Rhody, Olson, Mulder <br />Motion defeated 3-4. <br />The report to the Council, on May 22nd, is that the Planning Commission <br />did not approve a recommendation. The motion failed 3(ayes) to 4 <br />(nays). <br />