2000_0612_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Date: May 13, 2000 T0: Roseville City Council RE: Lakeridge Parking Lot Expansion Proposal Lakeridge could have the parking lot expansion they wish and still preserve one-half of the plants and trees on this 70-foot wide partial strip of land which was intended to separate B-i commercial from the neighborhood which existed 25 years before Lakeridge. The problem is that they are unwiliing to replace the wall that is there now. Mr. Palmquist of Lakeridge has offered to build the wall — but only if we pay for it. We have decided to pay if we must. We will offer $10,000 for the easterly 25 feet of their property, which they can put toward a wall, and we can reserve as an area for nature. In an effort to reduce costs, Lakeridge wishes to remove virtually all plant life and create a steep hill that requires no wall. Any thing that goes over the fence would come quickly crashing down into the parking lot. And what of the possibility of mudslides? These plants and trees are vital for life in the neighborhood — They separate neighbors from the sights and sounds associated with the 24-hour 7-day operation of the Lakeridge facility. And they provide life to many animals. Lakeridge created its own problems by expanding beyond their means. The neighborhood was here first and should be protected. I believe Lakeridge should leave one-half of the present vegetation in place. This can be accomplished by turning down this request for permit. Instead, Lakeridge should be encouraged to develop their parking lot expansion with a plan that has less environmental impact — a plan that is in harmony with the neigtibors and the community — a plan that is befitting of Roseville. I urge you to reject this plan and urge Lakeridge to work out a satisfactory arrangement with its neighbors. Sincerely, George Tessmer 2774 Lakeview Avenue