My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000_0627_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000
>
2000_0627_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 4:07:08 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:50:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The character of the parcel (through lot) creates a practical difficulty for the applicant. <br />The proposed 6-U2 foot tall fence will not impact sight lined at the intersection of <br />County Road C and Sheldon Street. <br />S. None of the adjacent properties (this one included) face County Road C; therefore, the <br />fence will not impact front yard views. <br />6. The proposed variance in is harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's <br />Comprehensive plan and Title 10 (zoning) of the City Code. <br />The variance will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare. <br />Conditions: <br />I. The fence shall be limited to 6-1/2 feet in height. <br />2. The fence shall be located feet from the south (County Road C) property line. <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Tuesday, June 27, 2000; and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br />1 Section 1012.OZB2 (Required Yards & Open Spaces) stipulates that fences in front yards <br />shall be limited to four feet in height. <br />2 The property located at 2655 Sheldon Street has two front yards, one located along Sheldon <br />Street and the other along County Road C. <br />A variance requires the applicant to prove physical hardship and to demonstrate that no <br />practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance. <br />The unique location of the property adjacent to County Road C, a rail line, and across from <br />industrial uses adversely impacts the privacy and safety of the applicant and his family. <br />S The hardship is not the applicant's creation. <br />6 The property cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions permitted by the <br />ordinance. A four foot high fence would not provide adequate screening from County Road <br />C, the rail line, and adjacent industrial uses. <br />If granted, the variance will not impact the health, safety, or general welfare of the <br />community. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.