My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000_0724_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000
>
2000_0724_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 4:25:30 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 24th day of July 2000, at 6:30 <br />p. m. <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO SECTION 1004.O1A13 <br />OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE <br />FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1858 HAMLINE AVENUE (PF3236) <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.01A13 stipulates that accessory structures, principle <br />structures, pavement surfaces, and concrete surfaces shall not exceed 30% of the total lot area; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, Robert Reichenbach & Gail Anderson have requested approval to allow <br />construction of a 26 foot by 32 foot (832 square foot) detached garage in their rear yard area; and <br />WHEREAS, the Reichenbach/Anderson request requires an 11% variance to the 30% <br />(41 % proposed) allowable impervious area and a conditional use permit to increase to building <br />area in a rear yard from 40% to 45%; and <br />WHEREAS, the purpose of the large detached garage is for storage of a classic car, boat, <br />a vehicle, and ancillary yard and personal items; <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the <br />request on Wednesday, July 12, 2000, and recommended (6-1) approval a modified variance <br />based on the following findings: <br />A. There is a physical hardship in the request by the applicant for a variance to exceed <br />the permitted lot coverage. <br />B. The applicant did not create the hardship. <br />C. There is a unique physical feature to the property that would justify the variance, <br />specifically the narrow shape of the lot and requiring an e�tended length of driveway. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.