My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000_1023_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000
>
2000_1023_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:00:13 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:51:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was determined the porch must be removed. <br />Code 70% Existing Condition Proposed Variance <br />Requirement Requirement Condition Condition <br />Lot Width at Shoreline 100 feet 70 feet 48 feet Same 52 feet <br />Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. 10,5000 sq. ft. 12,600 sq. ft. Same None <br />Impervious Coverage 25%43,,Si?��j. ft.) NA 17.3°l0 (2,182 sq. ft.) 43.�°% �None <br />Shoreland Setback 75 feet NA 33 feet 33 feet 42 feet <br />Side Yard Setback 5 feet NA 29 feet 29 feet 2.1 feet <br />3.0 STAFF COMMENT <br />3.1 Variances may be granted where the strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the <br />ordinance would cause "undue hardship". The granting of a variance shall only occur <br />when it can be demonstrated that such an action will be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the ordinance. <br />3.2 "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting a variance means the property <br />in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the <br />official controls, the plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property not created by the land owner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the locality. <br />3.3 Conditions may be attached to a variance that mitigate the impacts on adjoining <br />properties. <br />3.4 The Sladky home was constructed in 1930 as a cabin and includes a detached garage. <br />The home is built on a flat portion of the lot with a rising elevation to the northeast that is <br />mostly held in place by a retaining wall. The lot also slopes gently to the lake. The <br />house has been remodeled into a four-season home. Access to the property extends south <br />along a private drive from North McCarrons Boulevard. Sewer and water serve the <br />house. <br />3.5 The Sladky request has been forwarded to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) <br />for review and comment. Staff was able to review the request with Mr. Joe Richter of the <br />DNR where the following items were discussed: Mr. Richter indicated the DNR would <br />not oppose the replacement in the exact location. However, he indicated a desire to <br />have the four-season porch reduced (would require smaller size than existing concrete <br />slab) to lessen the impact of the shore land setback or the option of reconstruction the <br />porch on the east side of the home. The DNR would like the Sladkys to look into these <br />options, but should these alternatives not be appropriate given existing conditions, the <br />DNR would support the variance and porch replacement. <br />PF3266 — RCA (102300) Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.