My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000_1211_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000
>
2000_1211_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 1:06:36 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:52:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�,������ <br />Request for Council Action <br />Date: December 11, 2000 <br />Item Number: F• 1 <br />Department Approval Manager Approval Agenda Section <br />�� �,�j Reports and Recommendations <br />Item Description: 2001 Employee Compensation for Exempt and Non-exempt Plan <br />Background: <br />The Citv Council authorized execution of three union contracts on October 30, 2000. The compensation terms <br />provided the LELS, Teamsters, 49 unions with a 2% hourly increase on January 1, 2000 and an additional2% <br />hourly increase May 1, 2001. On October 30, 2000, the City Council also directed the Acting City Manager <br />and Human Resource Staff to prepare wage and benefit settlements for the nonunion and administrative <br />employees for City Council action at a future meeting. These employees fall into two categories: nonexempt <br />and exempt. <br />Nonexempt: <br />The City Council endorsed and the staff administers a policy of parity that applies to all employees of the City. <br />According to this philosophy, comparable wages and benefits are consistently provided to the three unions and <br />two nonunion groups. Therefore, as the City agreed to provide 2000 and 2001 increases to the three unions, then <br />the same would apply to the nonexempt employees of the City. <br />Exem�t: <br />Similarly, staff conducted the annual salary survey. The communities surveyed included: Burnsville, Eagan <br />and St. Louis Park. These communities will provide an average increase of 3.3%. Staff contacted six other <br />communities. However, each indicated that increases for 2001 would not be available until first quarter 200 1. <br />Staff has found that when increases are offered for a particular fiscal after the fiscal year has begun that City of <br />Roseville employee morale declines. <br />Other Adiustments: <br />A review of the City's GIS position this past year has indicated that the position is somewhat misclassified considering the <br />expected planning related duties. Included in the 200 1 plan is a reclassification of this position to a City Planner position <br />with an emphasis on the City's GIS function. <br />The City's car allowance for Department Heads has not been adjusted since 1987. It is recommended that a change is <br />long over due and that the amount be adjusted from $225 per month to $275 per month. The Department Heads are <br />expected to use their own car and this allowance covers the related expenses for metro area tra�el. <br />Policv Implications: <br />Each year the City budgets for wage and benefit settlements for all employees are based on the best <br />information known or anticipated from area-wide labor settlement. In doing so, the City properly budgets for <br />such increases. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.