My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
100111_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2010
>
100111_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 3:36:09 PM
Creation date
1/21/2010 2:57:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment E <br />� Approve the Request by Clearwire, LLC for approval of a Conditional Use for a 150 foot <br />2 telecommunication tower at City Hall Campus (PF09-031) <br />3 Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon summarized the request of Clearwire for <br />4 erection of a 150' tall telecommunication tower on the City Hall Campus as a CONDITIONAL <br />5 USE, with staff recommending approval, with concurrence of the Planning Commission. Mr. <br />6 Trudgeon clarified that this was a land use issue before the City Council at this time, along with <br />� the City serving in their role as property owner. Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff's <br />8 recommendation for approval was based on whether it met code, Conditional Use criteria, and <br />s was predicated on staff's analysis as detailed in Section 7 of the report dated November 16, <br />� 0 2009. Mr. Trudgeon advised that, if approved, future discussion by the City Council on lease <br />� � terms and other items would then be forthcoming. Mr. Trudgeon noted that a representative of <br />� 2 Clearwire was present at tonight's meeting. <br />�� .� Discussion included lack of public comment at the Planning Commission Public Hearing related <br />� 4 to this request, and focused on the proposed tower at Acorn Park. <br />� 5 Councilmember Pust expressed concern on the proposed location of the tower on the campus and <br />� 6 visual aesthetics; opining that there must be another location on campus that would <br />� � accommodate the tower and be less visible; while speaking in support of the commercial <br />� s enterprise. Councilmember Pust spoke in opposition to this proposed location, opining that it <br />� 9 would be an eyesore and that she didn't want that presentation to the community. <br />. Mr. Trudgeon reviewed four other locations on campus that were considered by several staff <br />2� members, with this being the recommended location. <br />Mayor Klausing recognized Councilmember Pust's concerns, and the original requirement that <br />the towers be located on public land to allow greater control and discretion as to their locations. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that they were not required to be located on public land, but as a <br />25 Conditional Use on industrial, business or commercial properties as well. <br />. Mayor Klausing noted that the City would lose revenue if the tower were located on land other <br />�� than public land; however, noted that that this didn't factor into the land use analysis and <br />2s understood the aesthetic issues, while recognizing the viability of them as a utility and needing <br />29 accommodation. Mayor Klausing questioned whether the balance in additional revenue served as <br />3o a trade-off for aesthetics, in addition to providing a public service. <br />3� Councilmember Johnson opined that, while supporting the tower on campus, aesthetically this <br />32 was the worst possible location and suggested consideration be given to placing the tower within <br />33 the Public Works yard. <br />34 Tony Vavoulis, Clearwire Representative <br />35 Mr. Vavoulis summarized the review of four other sites on campus, with all, including the <br />36 proposed location, driven by staff review and recommendation. Mr. Vavoulis noted that the <br />3� existing tower had been determined to be at capacity structurally; and reviewed the needs in <br />3s locating the firm's internet antenna evenly throughout the community, and their preference to co- <br />39 locate on existing towers rather than constructing new towers. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.