Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January 11, 2010 <br />Page 10 <br />for those towers were usually privately owned towers or antennae were located on <br />water towers. <br />Councilmember Pust questioned that, of the proposed 7 - 9 sites in Roseville, <br />whether any were on existing AT & T sites. <br />Mr. Vavoulis advised that Clearwire was currently in negotiations with AT & T <br />for space on the Chandler Vault building; and that of the five sites he's involved <br />with in Roseville, four were proposed for public property and the other at the <br />Chandler building. Mr. Vavoulis advised that other sites were along the perimeter <br />of the community, and had no additional information or identify on those pro- <br />posed sites. <br />Councilmember Pust questioned if there would be additional requests forthcom- <br />ing from Clearwire and/or their subcontractors for sites in Roseville. <br />Mr. Vavoulis advised that his group was close to overlapping their search rings, <br />but if the Acorn Park request was not successful, additional locations would need <br />to be considered to fill in those coverage gaps, based on complex mathematical <br />designs by the company's engineers. <br />Mayor Klausing moved adoption of a Resolution entitled, "A Resolution Approv- <br />ing a 150-foot Telecommunication Tower Facility as a Conditional Use in Accor- <br />dance with Roseville City Code, Sections 1013.10 and 1014.01, for Clearwire, <br />LLC and the City of Roseville (PF-09-031)." <br />Councilmember Johnson questioned whether the City Council needed to identify <br />the specific and preferred site on the City Hall campus as part of their action. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that, as the property owner, the City Council could deter- <br />mine their preferred location tonight; or make that determination at a later meet- <br />ing when lease agreements are brought forward for consideration; however, he <br />suggested that it may be worthwhile for the City Council to identify their pre- <br />ferred location at tonight's meeting. Mr. Trudgeon advised that, from staffs per- <br />spective, they recommended the proposed parking lot site, as relocated from the <br />original proposed site, as the most advantageous location. <br />Mayor Klausing concurred and withdrew his motion. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that, based on the language of the resolution, the Site <br />Plan was part of the resolution by attachment. <br />Terre Heiser, City of Roseville IT Network Manager <br />Mr. Heiser addressed staff's rationale for the preferred location (Site 1) is slightly <br />modified site from the original site moved 50-60' further to the east and shielded <br />