Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, November 04, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />Chair Doherty closed the Public Hearing at 6:53 p.m.; no one appeared for or <br />against. <br />Chair Doherty spoke in support of the Conditional Use, but in opposition to the <br />Variance for additional height, based on the lack of evidence of a defined <br />hardship. <br />Chair Doherty questioned the ramifications if the Conditional Use was approved, <br />but the Variance denied. <br />Chair Doherty advised that this would allow the applicant to explore alternatives, <br />while still being able to construct the garage, without the additional height <br />currently allowed by City Code. <br />Commissioner Boerigter, while sympathetic to the plight of the applicant, noted <br />that the overall height to midpoint of the roof was not beyond current Code, and <br />only the wall height above the nine feet (9’) allowed was the issue. Commissioner <br />Boerigter questioned the purpose of that provision, if it was due to the building <br />looking that much higher with higher walls. However, Commissioner Boerigter <br />concurred that this didn’t equate to a defined hardship that would justify granting <br />the variance. Commissioner Boerigter questioned if this portion of the City Code <br />should be reviewed for further refinement. <br />Commissioner Boerigter spoke in support of the Conditional Use, but spoke in <br />opposition to the Variance; and suggested that the applicant pursue alternatives <br />to accommodating the motor home with a nine foot (9’) wall and midpoint roof at <br />fifteen feet (15’). While unfortunate, Commissioner Boerigter advised that he <br />could not support deviating from the current code. <br />Commissioner Wozniak spoke in support of the Conditional Use, but in <br />opposition to the Variance, and echoed Commissioner Boerigter’s observations; <br />while recognizing the applicant’s attempt to remove an eyesore, he could not find <br />evidence of a hardship to support the Variance. <br />MOTION <br />Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Doherty to RECOMMEND <br />TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL a CONDITIONAL USE for Richard <br />Martin, 2970 Mildred Avenue; based on the comments and findings of <br />Section 6, and the conditions of Section 7 of the staff report dated <br />November 16, 2009. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />MOTION <br />Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member Cook to RECOMMEND TO <br />THE CITY COUNCIL DENIAL of the Variance requested by Richard Martin, <br />2970 Mildred Avenue; based on the comments and findings of Section 5 of <br />the staff report dated November 16, 2009. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Chair Doherty noted that the case was scheduled to be heard by the City Council <br />at their November 16, 2009 meeting. <br />Commissioner Wozniak spoke in support of including this portion of City Code in <br />the overall review of the City’s Zoning Code, for possible modification. <br />City Planner Paschke advised that he had duly noted that suggestion; and <br />encouraged additional comment from individual Commissioners on areas <br /> <br />