Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, November 04, 2009 <br />Page 4 <br />throughout the code needing improvement, modification or consistency of which <br />they were aware. <br />b. Planning File 09-031 <br />Request by Clearwire, LLC for approval of a 150-foot telecommunication <br />tower on the City Hall Campus, 2660 – 2661 Civic Center Drive, as a <br />Conditional Use, pursuant to City Code, Sections 1013 (General <br />Requirements) and 1014 (Conditional Use) <br />Chair Doherty opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 09-031 at 7:02 p.m. <br />Mr. Lloyd reviewed the request of the applicant for a Conditional Use to erect the <br />tower, convey it to the City, and lease space for their telecommunication <br />equipment on and at the base of the tower; making the City a potential partner in <br />the application in addition to its being the landowner. Mr. Lloyd advised that <br />Clearwire provides fixed Internet access as well as mobile access; and that this <br />was only one of several hundred proposed towers at sites throughout the <br />metropolitan area; with current tower owners contacted before exploring <br />development of new towers. Mr. Lloyd advised that the existing monopole on the <br />City Hall campus was already at capacity, thus the proposal to construct an <br />additional tower at the proposed location. <br />Mr. Lloyd advised that staff was unable to find any significant negative impact, <br />with wireless transmission equipment providing immediate benefit to City <br />operations, and allowing for potential future benefit for wireless meter reading <br />and other technology. <br />Mr. Lloyd advised that staff in several City departments supported the requested <br />action; and staff recommended APPROVAL of the request by Clearwire, LLC for <br />construction of a 150-foot telecommunication tower on the City Hall Campus, <br />2660 – 2661 Civic Center Drive as a CONDITIONAL USE, pursuant to City <br />Code, Section 1014.01, and subject to conditions as detailed in Section 9 of the <br />staff report dated November 4, 2009. <br />Discussion among staff and Commissioners included clarification of the actual <br />height of the existing tower (150’); similarity of construction to the existing tower; <br />and review of proposed locations other than that being considered, and rationale <br />for dispensing with those other locations. <br />Further discussion included economic incentives for the City to support this new <br />tower; with that potential acknowledged based on lease payments and additional <br />revenues that would provide economic incentives; however, noting that the <br />recommendation at the Planning Commission level needed to be focused on <br />strict land use considerations; with the City Council ultimately considering <br />financial incentives and final approval. Staff advised that, if the request was <br />approved, a contract would need to be negotiated by other City staff with ultimate <br />approval of any such contract by the City Council. <br />Commissioner Doherty opined that, if it was not good economically for the City, <br />he was unsure of his support for the request. <br />Mr. Lloyd suggested that, even if there were no revenue gains from construction <br />of the tower, the City could realize operational benefits for their wireless needs. <br />Mr. Paschke suggested that the discussion refocus on the land use. <br />Commissioner Boerigter concurred, noting that the Planning Commission’s <br />charge should focus only on viable land use applicability; and the need for the <br />City Council to make a determination, after that land use approval, whether the <br />tower was economically feasible. <br />Terre Heiser, City of Roseville’s Director of Information Technology (IT) <br /> <br />