My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_110409
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
pm_110409
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2010 10:47:05 AM
Creation date
3/1/2010 10:47:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/4/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, November 04, 2009 <br />Page 8 <br />150’ tower to accommodate multiple users and avoid multiple towers through <br />maximizing space on those towers. Mr. Lloyd advised that Clearwire was not <br />opposed to additional tower height, but was only seeking 120’ in height. Mr. Lloyd <br />advised that the City’s Parks & Recreation Departments preferred a 120’ tower <br />as the least intrusive; the City’s IT Department noted that it limited providers, with <br />the additional height addressing terrain and adjacent structure issues. Mr. Lloyd <br />advised that the Park and Recreation Department staff and Advisory <br />Commission’s impetus was amenable to Clearwire, since their ground equipment <br />is minimal and largely invisible in the park, based on the compact nature of the <br />equipment box. However, Mr. Lloyd advised that to accommodate other <br />providers, a larger ground equipment structure area was proposed, perhaps up <br />to 20’ x 20’, similar to that at City Hall. <br />Mr. Lloyd advised that some City staff members had originally recommended <br />limiting the tower height to 120’ with one (1) user, requiring small ground <br />equipment area. However, when reviewed by the City’s Planning staff, they were <br />noting that Zoning Code advocated for multiple user rather than single user <br />towers, and in order to provide for multiple users, a taller tower and additional <br />ground space was required. Therefore, Mr. Lloyd advised that Planning Division <br />staff was only recommending a 150’ tower with ground space sufficient for <br />multiple users to support that co-location of users on one tower; with a 20’ x 20’ <br />equipment structure. <br />Mr. Lloyd advised that the Parks & Recreation Commission met earlier this week <br />and reviewed the proposed location, with accommodation provided for additional <br />lighting for the hockey rink to avoid construction or installation of additional light <br />poles. Mr. Lloyd advised that Parks & Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke had <br />provided a summary of their Advisory Commission’s review, at which they <br />reluctantly supported a pole for one (1) provider, Clearwire, while not being totally <br />amenable to the proposed location by the hockey rink. Mr. Brokke indicated, in <br />his summary, that the Commission’s discussion included seeking possible <br />locations for the monopole other than the proposed location near the hockey rink; <br />and noted that the Commission just now embarking on the Parks & Recreation <br />Master Plan process and were reluctant to approve a tower structure on park <br />property without knowing the end results of that study and future proposed uses <br />for the park. At the meeting, Commissioners questioned if the pole could be <br />relocated if necessary once it was installed and if the Master Plan process <br />suggested a different site; and expressed their apprehension about a tower <br />located in Acorn Park in general. <br />From his review of their meeting by video, Mr. Lloyd opined that they seemed <br />amenable when considering a single or smaller user requiring less ground space; <br />but expressed more trepidation when considering something larger and requiring <br />additional ground space. Mr. Lloyd recognized their apprehension; but noted that <br />a single-user facility was in conflict with the City’s zoning ordinance, advocating <br />for larger towers to accommodate more users. Mr. Lloyd advised that Planning <br />Staff, given the various considerations and issues, would advocate for a 150’ <br />tower, with a larger enclosure at Acorn Park; and if another site was suggested, it <br />would need to be further reviewed by Parks & Recreation, IT, and Planning staff, <br />along with Clearwire, to determine the most appropriate location. <br />Discussion between staff and Planning Commissioners included the estimated <br />time frame for completion of the Parks & Recreation Master Plan process, <br />projected to require several months minimum; options for approval with <br />conditions and to ensure any location chosen would be consistent with the <br />Master Plan study recommendations; potential ramifications to the obligation of <br />the Clearwire representative to secure the land use applications and apply for <br />building permits by the end of 2009 to ready the system for installation in the <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.