CC_Minutes_2010_0222 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, February 22, 2010 Page 10 City Manager Malinen noted previous discussions at the Special Strategic Plan- ning Session and a request to hold meetings with individual Department Heads for their specific operations and challenges for the next budget cycle. Mr. Malinen advised that March 1, 2010 had been designated for this meeting, but that no offi- cial action had been taken to set the date. During discussion of the specific time for the meeting, Mr. Malinen advised that he anticipated forty-five minutes for each Department. Roe moved, Johnson, seconded, scheduling a Special Meeting for Monday, March 1, 2010 at 6:30 p.m. for the purpose of continuing Strategic Planning with De- partment Heads. Councilmember Johnson suggested that Councilmembers move to the table rather than at the dais for this meeting; and confirmed that the meeting was open to the public and would be televised as well. Roll Call Ayes: Johnson; Pust; Roe; and Klausing. Nays: None. 9. General Ordinances for adoption a. Adopt Illicit Discharge Ordinance An updated copy of the proposed Ordinance identified as "Attachment C," was included as a Bench Handout. City Engineer Debra Bloom briefly reviewed the revisions made to the proposed Storm Water Illicit Discharge and Connections Ordinance, incorporating com- ments and recommendations of the City Council since initial presentation at their January 25, 2010 meeting; as well as City Attorney review of the language and re- lated code changes to create consistency between other sections of the code and this new section, as detailed in the RCA dated February 22, 2010. For the purpose of identifying that the property and/or the violator can be as- sessed, and as an additional remedy under certain circumstances, City Attorney Bartholdi suggested one additional change to the language on page 7, line 21, Section N.4., last sentence, change to read: "the amount due shall constitute a lien upon, and the City shall have the right to assess such cost against the property owned by such violator(s) pursuant to Min- nesota Statute 429.101 " Ms. Bloom identified several additional sections of Roseville City Code on the bench handout with recommended language revisions, including Section 205 re-