My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0222
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0222
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2010 12:42:56 PM
Creation date
3/12/2010 12:42:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/22/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, February 22, 2010 <br />Page 21 <br />Discussion among Councilmembers included advantages and disadvantages of <br />backyard and/or street parking of RV's; other storage options off-site; code incon- <br />sistencies; enjoyment of private property; and various examples. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of the review for the purpose of reviewing Code <br />inconsistencies, but not for the purpose of expanding the ability to store RV's on <br />private property. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that considerations concerned public safety, quality <br />of life, and environmental issues. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that this was a concern he'd heard often in the com- <br />munity; and advised that he could not offer a suitable answer, but concurred with <br />Councilmember Pust that it should be looked at to determine inconsistencies in <br />Code related to trailer versus motor driven and parking within a boulevard, to en- <br />sure that the Code was clear and fair. <br />Councilmember Pust noted that the RV conversation may include storage of <br />boats. Councilmember Pust suggested that a citizen task force, or one of the City <br />Council's advisory commissions may be a more appropriate place for discussion. <br />Councilmember Johnson offered no public comment at this time, opining that he <br />was unsure if this was a battle he was interested in pursuing; however, he did see <br />the inconsistencies apparent in current Code. <br />Councilmember Pust, at the suggestion of Mayor Klausing, advised that she <br />would facilitate a public meeting to hear various citizen views, at which time she <br />would make recommendation to the City Council as to whether further City <br />Council review and consideration was indicated. <br />Public Comment <br />Ed Etner, Resident and RV Owner <br />Mr. Etner advised that he owned a motorized RV, but was unable to gain access <br />to his backyard, and parked it on the driveway, and knew of three similar situa- <br />tions in his neighborhood. Mr. Etner expressed concern with the government re- <br />gulating his property rights. <br />Councilmember Pust recognized Mr. Etner's viewpoint; however, she noted other <br />examples, such as a person with no backyard access, and their driveway too steep <br />for parking the RV, with their only option to park it on the street. Councilmember <br />Pust requested Mr. Etner's suggestions for resolution. <br />Mr. Etner suggested that, if neighbors had an issue, they could resolve it among <br />themselves without having another regulation placed upon them. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.