Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, February 22, 2010 <br />Page 20 <br />Councilmember Pust further clarified the original motion to DENY the request <br />because of adverse impacts to traffic; and increasing traffic conflicts due to the <br />parcel's close proximity to Lexington Avenue. <br />After further discussion, Councilmembers Pust and Johnson withdrew their mo- <br />tion. <br />Roe moved, Johnson seconded, tabling action on this item until the March 8, 2010 <br />meeting at the request of the City Attorney. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Johnson; Pust; Roe; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />City Attorney Bartholdi advised that he would like to perform further review to <br />determine that the City had sufficient grounds to order compliance since the Vete- <br />rinary Clinic use was not in play, and to determine if there were additional viola- <br />tions, or if it was not conforming to other zoning ordinances such as impervious <br />surface parking requirements. <br />13. Business Items - Presentations/Discussions <br />a. Discuss Commercial Use of Public Property <br />As previously noted, this item was deferred to a subsequent meeting at the request <br />of Councilmember Ihlan. <br />b. Discuss Recreational Vehicle and Trailer Parking <br />Councilmember Pust presented initial information and examples of various types <br />of recreational vehicle (RV) storage within the City, and various inconsistencies <br />in City Code related to storage and/or parking of those vehicles, the type of sur- <br />face for their storage, and whether they were motorized or pulled by another ve- <br />hicle. Councilmember Pust also noted that current State Statute no longer defined <br />vehicle weight definitions. Councilmember Pust noted concerns she had heard <br />from residents concerning neighborhood curb appeal, aesthetics, and visibility ha- <br />zards when parked in the front yard; and questioned if the City wanted to encour- <br />age impervious surfaces being applied in backyards to facilitate current City Code <br />language for storage of RV's. Councilmember Pust noted other residents who <br />feel that storage of RV's in a neighboring back yard impacted their feeling of <br />peace and tranquility, as well as aesthetics; and suggested that a review of current <br />Code and those of other communities could remove ambiguities as well remove <br />neighborhood angst and conflict. <br />