My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-03-20_Agenda
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2007
>
2007-03-20_Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 8:10:16 AM
Creation date
3/17/2010 2:31:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/20/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />Majerus recommended that action on the issue be delayed until March and that Ms. <br />Bennett continue to provide limited serv ices for the HRA during that time. <br /> <br />Member Pust agreed and noted that the administrative piece seems to be more cost <br />effective than having the Executive Director complete these tasks. However, she <br />questioned that doing those admin functions wo uld take more than 10 hours per week and <br />would like to make sure that tim e spent on HRA duties is identified. <br /> <br />Mr. Stark noted that the HRA would only be charged for time spent on HRA work from <br />the administrative position. <br /> <br />Member Kelsey questioned what was include d in the job description and wondered why <br />the full HRA board was not able to comment on that job description. <br /> <br />Mr. Stark noted that this was discussed at th e finance subcommittee level and that he was <br />working on the issue with that committee and not the full board. <br /> <br />Motion : Member Majerus moved, seconded by Member Pust, to table item 8.c. regarding the <br />HRA staffing options until March 20, 2007 <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />9. Information, Reports and Other Business <br /> <br />a. Discuss Rental Housing Report and Recommendations to the City Council <br />and Next Steps <br /> <br />Chair Majerus provided a summary regarding th e City Council comments and feedback on the <br />HRA’s recommendations regarding rental housing issues in Roseville. He noted that it was a <br />productive and positive discussion and that the Ci ty Council supported the recommendations and <br />requested that the HRA move forward on the additi onal information needed for implementation. <br /> <br />Member Pust agreed that it was a good discussion a nd that all the council members and the public <br />seemed to agree with the recommendation to su spend moving forward with a rental licensing <br />program and rather try to address the issues through the CAG group recommendation including a <br />rental registration program. <br /> <br />Ms. Bennett requested direction regarding the next steps for the HRA since implementation of a <br />rental registration program would require City C ouncil action by ordinance rather than further <br />action from the HRA. <br /> <br />Mr. Stark noted that the Council directed “sta ff” to move forward on the recommendation but <br />each item should be addressed in partnership with HRA staff and City staff. He noted that the <br />enforcement issues are clearly city staff issues and that his department is working on suggestions <br />for the City Council’s review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.