Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Carolyn Olson, president of Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC), commented that in <br />administering the Senior Housing Regeneration Progr am, GMHC often sees homes that are at or around <br />median value ($233,000) but require $35,000 in rehab to address code compliance or delayed <br />maintenance issues. Often, the homeowners are on fixed incomes. Ms. Olson noted that the HRA <br />Ownership Loan Program was created as a tool to maintain and revitalize Roseville housing stock. <br /> <br />Noting the income limitation for the Senior Housing Regeneration Program (80% of median income), <br />Member Pust wondered if the RHRA should consider a similar income limitatio n for the HRA Ownership <br />Loan Program. Ms. Bennett noted that RHRA program s are designed to supplement existing state and <br />county loan programs which typically have an income limitation of 80% of median income. The RHRA <br />recognized that middle incomes families ma y also have a need for assistance. <br /> <br />Motion: Chair Majerus moved, seconded by Member Kelsey, to table making any <br />modifications to the Roseville Owner Occupi ed Loan Program eligibility criteria and <br />directed staff to prepare a summary of the aver age assessed valuation for Roseville single <br />family homes as well as a summary of existi ng programs and what specific criteria is <br />targeted. <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />b. Update on HRA Senior Housing Regene ration Program and Approve Program <br />Modifications. <br /> <br />Ms. Bennett explained that this item was placed on the ag enda in response to a special meeting to approve <br />a sale of a home in this program in which the gap was larger than what had been previously approved by <br />the RHRA. RHRA board members requested a discussion of status of the homes in the Senior Housing <br />Regeneration Program (SHRP), market issues that have affected the program and the direction of the <br />program. Ms. Bennett explained that with the changing market, the SHRP homes have been on the <br />market longer than anticipated, therefore creating a larger gap at the time of their sale than initially <br />approved by the RHRA. <br /> <br />Ms. Bennett gave a summary of the status of the homes in the program noting that the Rondo Land Trust <br />has expressed interest in purchasing one of the SHRP homes at 960 Lovell Ave. which would provide for <br />long-term affordability at this particular house. Ms. Bennett indicated that the SHRP fund is running low <br />with only $18,000 remaining of the $200,000 that initially funded the program, with no additional <br />funding available at this time. <br /> <br />Carolyn Olson, president of Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) which administers the <br />SHRP, noted that 11 homes in Roseville have been renovated and resold in Roseville since the program’s <br />inception. Member Kelsey stressed the importance of marketing the SHRP homes and agreed with the <br />marketing recommendations made by staff. Member Ke lsey also suggested weekly emails to realtors, <br />hosting realtor open houses and targe ting mailings to renters to better educate the public about RHRA <br />programs. Chair Majerus suggested creating a timeline for the marketing recommendations to better <br />assess their effectiveness. Member Elkins noted that Minnesota Housing website may be a resource for <br />even greater exposure to realtors. Ms. Olson sugg ested sending emails to Fire Department staff. <br /> <br />Member Kelsey agreed with the staff recomme ndation to limit further home purchases through the <br />program until the remaining SHRP homes are sold a nd reevaluate the program for the next budgeting <br />process. Chair Majerus pointed out that the market is cyclical and the RHRA needs to react accordingly. <br />