Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />HRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Tuesday, February 17, 2009 <br />Page 4 <br />received in the community, and by those neighbors finally finding resolution of chronic code <br />enforcement issues in their neighborhoods. Councilmember Pust suggested that ways be found <br />to build on the success of the program. <br />Chair Maschka concurred; and suggested that this would be another good spring project to <br />newspaper and newsletter coverage; and opined that the program was working well. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that citizens were happy to do more if they were made aware of <br />resources and processes. ,�;�` <br />Member Elkin advised that in her work she had been involved with srimulus � ds, and opined <br />that it was not an easy program, and involved substanrial red tape. MemberE �, , advised that <br />the purpose of the current Neighborhood Stabilizarion Program was to r, itali� uniries <br />faced with foreclosed properties and was specific to bank-owned pro���ies _ <br />Chair Maschka recognized that no foreclosed properry pro <br />Discussion ensued regarding various government p <br />would be processed and distributed once the details <br />Ms. Kelsey noted the staff report on January 2009 for� <br />while being the highest seen to-date in Roseville, were <br />suburbs and communities were dealing with. <br />easy to <br />stimulus packages <br />compared to 2008 figures, <br />side�ablv fewer than other <br />Chair Maschka noted his intent to �" mmunity lead`ers and multi-family housing <br />owners at an upcoming round table `�„;,,�;��r�tiine if there was a problem in <br />Roseville, what those problems may be nd to e '� �or solurions for any problems seen. <br />Chair Maschka advised that, following'� at eting, � would return to the RHRA with that <br />informarion to discuss the role for the � if so indicated. <br />Member Masche opi�. �hat the 2009 �9x�° Plan was ambirious; however, suggested that <br />periodic reports t,�s � 'Council needeC�'to be an essential part of the growth of the RHRA <br />and the City C�ncil's s��ort of the RI��A. <br />Mr. Tru e <br />quarterly; ho <br />� <br />������mber Pu <br />�e������� Ciry <br />Further <br />locaring <br />�� �report to the City Council was originally intended to be <br />tl�at it was a regular part of each monthly agenda now. <br />that staff e-mail her a one paragraph summary report to present <br />n included income allowance for first time homebuyer credits; and <br />the community of Roseville and advantages to those homebuyers in their <br />Majerus suggested that the RHRA seek, from a procedural point, to proactively <br />communicarion between the RHRA and City Council. <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted tl�at the City Council's practice was to meet jointly with each advisory <br />commission and committee; and that this provided a perfect opportunity to discuss various <br />issues. <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted the addirion of four (4) additional items to the 2009 Work Plan: <br />o Explore srimulus/grant opporiunities and programs <br />o Rental registration report status <br />o Improve code enforce in non-financial ways (i.e., educarion and information) <br />