Laserfiche WebLink
The 20101evy while higher than 2009's levy of $258,000 is justified, staff believes, for the <br />following reasons: <br />✓ The cash carryover practice did not accurately reflect the programming needs for <br />the RHRA and underestimated the costs for all of the RHRA obligations. <br />✓ Every year since 2009, the RHRA contributes approximately $17,000 for code <br />enforcement activities provided by City staf£ As a result of that contribution <br />other funding priorities are not able to take place. <br />✓ In 2009, the HRA committed the use of $105,000 of its funds to pay for <br />abatement of code violations throughout the city. <br />The 2010 budget request is based on the RHRA Strategic Plan and the Cities Comprehensive Plan <br />that identifies some new initiatives including programs with more "green" themes, better marketing <br />of RHRA programs, and funding appropriate staffing levels and resources. The 2010 RHRA budget <br />is the first one that fully addresses the RHRA priorities in the strategic plan and the Comprehensive <br />plan. <br />On 7uly 27th, the RHRA reviewed the preliminary budget numbers reflecting all of the programming <br />needed to fulfill the goals in the new strategic plan and Comprehensive Plan. At that meeting, staff <br />presented an overall budget of $598,000 with a levy of $498,000. <br />The RHRA Board while recognizing that the proposed budget would allow the RHRA to carry out <br />the strategic plan and Comp Plan, felt that it was too large of an increase to the 2009 levy and <br />requested staff work with the Finance sub-committee on a budget that would meet as many of the <br />RHRA priorities and goals as possible while keeping the 2010 HRA levy as low as possible. <br />The Finance sub-committee met on July 30th and recommended that the budget and levy be reduced . <br />The total budget proposed for consideration now will be $440,500 with a HRA levy of $370,500. <br />Since that time, staff is recommending removal of $17,000 for a single-family residential marketing <br />study as the recently received multi-family market study prepared by Ma�'ield contains information <br />about the single-family residential market. With that deletion, the proposed budgetis $423,500 with <br />an HRA levy of $353,500. The proposed 2010 budget is $218,900 less than last years budget, <br />although the levy is $95,500 higher than the 20091evy. <br />2010 RHRA Budget Details <br />In 2010, the following programs will continue to operate, but will receive no additional funds: <br />✓ Roseville Loan Program (consolidated home improvement loan program). <br />✓ Abatement Assistance (payment of abatement costs for code enforcement <br />activities) <br />✓ SHRP — no RHRA funds allocated, but Greater Metropolitan Housing <br />Corporation (GMHC) may still purchase homes in Roseville. <br />In 2010, the following programs will be continued or expanded: <br />RHRA 2010 Budget Discussion - Page 2 of 4 <br />