Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />HRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, July 27, 2009 <br />Page 2 <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />7. Public Hearings <br />None. <br />8. Action Items <br />Commissioner Furnham arrived at this time, approximately 4:50 p.m. <br />a. Discussion of 2010 Budget <br />Strate�ic Plan Update <br />Executive Director Trudgeon noted the draft of staff's revisions to the �i�ate�� from the <br />July 8, 2009 HRA workshop; previously provided to members via �`x�ail, witli' ments <br />heard to-date by staff. Mr. Trudgeon noted attempts by staff to link lib�sing areas o- �� �i��s <br />Comprehensive Plan to the HRA Strategic Plan, with a red kiti�.'�py provided to ����ibers <br />highlighting those revisions. <br />Members had no comments on the Strategic Plan <br />2010 Preliminarv Bud�et <br />Mr. Trudgeon presented staff's "first draf�' of a propose <br />those uuriatives incorporated into the 2008 — 2012 HRA <br />numbers to those potential projects. Mr. Trudgeon requested <br />HRA prior to their August 31, 2� �� , to all <br />recommendations to the City Council �� � <br />of Preliminary 2010 Budgets and Levie ����, <br />R Budget, incorporaring <br />� �� ��;r lan applying esrimated <br />� comment and review by the <br />staff time to prepare final <br />> regular meeting for adoprion <br />Mr. Trudgeon provided, as a bench han t, comparisons between 2009 and 2010 taY levies <br />and esrimated taY impacts, based on a$4,;:,; ,00 proposed 2010 budget. Mr. Trudgeon advised <br />that this represented,,�i��Three percent (�%�^`of the allowable maxiinum RHRA levy, which <br />would be $794 �.;���^ `�; �;�� Trudgeon no,�l� that this budget was more realisric and more <br />accurately refl��ted the ' w Strategic �?ian initiatives; and noted that substantial reserves in <br />place over�� last few,t�uc�get c�c� ��vere no longer available, due to further refinement and <br />trackingr �:�� of:,�i€�� �' ,�both revenue sources and actual expenses for specific <br />programs. "�� geon further noted that upfront code enforcement acrivities reduced <br />available fundin er I�RA acrivities to some eatent. <br />. noted,.r�iaff's recommendation for continuarion of the single-family loan <br />program, ���� ll as t�% abatement assistance program through 2010; and conrinuation of other <br />prograins a�,,;�; etailed in the staff report; and including additional training opporiunities for <br />Commissiotre'rs as the need arose; as well as incorporaring specific line items for phone and <br />office su expenses for better tracking of expenditures. Mr. Trudgeon reviewed the new <br />progra , roposed in the updated Strategic Plan, and as detailed in the staff report. <br />�li�'ussion among members and staff included how the $40,000 was identified for marketing <br />�oseville ("Why Roseville") with that number representing potential billboard advertising <br />along I-35W, as well as a large advertising campaign that would include radio rime to market <br />to the entire metropolitan area, rather than as currently done only to Roseville cirizens; and <br />minimal costs to continue the realtor education program and represented as a separate budget <br />line item. <br />Member Masche observed that this doubled levy actually was a function of readjusting the <br />previous $367,000 cash cartyover in the 2009 Budget that had now been spent, and needed to <br />be replenished with new levy dollars; and actually reflected a more careful review of all <br />