Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />g <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />HRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, July 27, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />eapenses/revenues over the last few years and more accurately reflected those numbers. Mr. <br />Masche noted that expenses had not increased to any substantial degree, and in some areas had <br />been reduced. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff would continue to monitor case carryovers from taY levy <br />payments semi-annually, and deferral of various items. Mr. Trudgeon noted the variables in <br />projecting budgets to meet the September 15, 2009 Preliminary Levy and Budget <br />requirements, while further changes are anricipated before December's final levy was due, and <br />hopefully allowing reduction of preliminary requests based on more info `" being <br />available at that time. Mr. Trudgeon noted that the preliminary budget could 1�,,,� educed, but <br />not increased for final adoprion. <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that it was staff's intent to make the HRA's 'ou ams self- <br />sustaining as revolving loan funds, as well as enhancing revenue so s(i.e., fe' conduit <br />financing requests similar to that of St. Louis Park), as the HRA a hose reco �� ' s <br />to the City Council for their approval. <br />Member Pust arrived at this rime, appro�mately 5:07 p.m. <br />Further discussion included how this levy acc��f� <br />�. <br />provided by the HRA; the need for the HRA to identi <br />that were in line with their uuriatives and prioriries; e� <br />up, not a hand out;" recognirion by the City's eaternal <br />strides in improving accountability in tracking expense <br />better communication with the City's �.; art� <br />rather than cash accounring system in "' ��� <br />Additional discussion included ways <br />printing of markering materials); and < <br />reserves. <br />For the benefit o�� '��'"` `Pust, Mr. <br />in the staff re�Qrt relate �'this year's <br />updated str�c plan. <br />it services currently being <br />needs on the Strategic Plan <br />the I�RA theme for a"hand <br />��. ;;.� <br />�tof the HRA's substantial <br />in its various funds through <br />ficulries in using an accrual <br />pursu�ig to become more cost-effective (i.e., <br />cartyover of approximately $25.000 in annual <br />�eon repeated the background information detailed <br />iininaty 2010 budget and levy request, based on the <br />Member Pust{ ' d that every $100,000 in expenses represented an approximate 1% levy <br />increase; and no this �reliminary request would indicate a 2.4% levy increase specific <br />ta t� HRA Mem �� opined that the City Council would count this against the City's <br />tb`tfi�"proposed 20101e �;.. �; and that the HRA needed to be prepared with a compelling argument <br />to "sell" their rariona3e for this substantial request to the City Council, when the City Manager <br />was considering presenting a zero percent levy. <br />Chair Ma a, and Mr. Trudgeon, noted tl�at this was needed discussion based on the updated <br />strategi„ an and realistic funding to accomplish those iniriatives. Chair Maschka noted that a <br />"` � o�vy increase would remain at $258,000 as in 2009. Mr. Trudgeon anricipated parameters <br />the City Council in August, following results of the community meetings currently in <br />Councilmember Pust further noted that, over the last siY (6) months, departments had cut their <br />collecrive budgets by $400,000 to address recent legislarive actions or lack thereof; and <br />recognizing another fifteen percent (15%) increase in health care costs, in addirion to other <br />employee-related expenses. <br />