My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-08-31_Agenda
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2009
>
2009-08-31_Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 11:23:45 AM
Creation date
3/17/2010 3:02:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/31/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />g <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />HRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, July 27, 2009 <br />Page 4 <br />Mr. Trudgeon recognized the annual challenges in presenting responsible budgets to provide <br />services valued and requested by residents, and in light of ever-increasing employee health <br />care and benefit costs. <br />Chair Maschka noted various components of the strategic plan and their dollar figures (i.e., <br />mulri-family loan program; work force down payment assistance); and if these concepts were <br />not immediately feasible, whether the City Council would consider allowing the HRA to <br />utilize its bonding authority to fund such initiarives. <br />Member Pust opined that this would be a valuable discussion, and that conside ��� ��' n needed to <br />be given to other deflators (i.e., cost of government), as well as fina and polirical <br />considerations. ��G.`G"" �_. <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted that the rarionale for updaring the strategic <br />older programs had been completed, or were no longer relevant, � <br />segments of the community needed to be reached, but tha �' " <br />additional cost. Mr. Trudgeon opined that the HRA could.,��em� <br />and not provide any additional innovations; howeverx `�aff di� <br />adequately doing their jobs or sufficiently providin� port to <br />community. <br />was tha`C of the <br />was evide Fer <br />� elements came` an <br />to maintain the st,�ius quo, <br />� ot think they would be <br />RA and needs of the <br />Further discussion included whether budget reductions wer able cross the board or by <br />delering or deferring specific programs; determination of th grams having the most <br />impact for the community, and havin the highest priority vers ose with more discretion; <br />public support of the Neighborhood t Program, and' progress to-date; and how to <br />,, <br />identify which tools to eliminate or re '� issues currently before the HRA. Mr. <br />Trudgeon noted those programs propos that r`"`: future costs and community impacts <br />through their immediate implementa n .e., mu -family program at $250,000); and <br />potentially phasing for some new progra G, ntil they become self-sustaining as revolving loan <br />programs. <br />Additional <br />established <br />how to en, <br />through the va� <br />HRA to make a <br />d clarifyin�!�nrrent budget requests with those funds already <br />;d on line.�item annual budgets (i.e., revolving loan programs); <br />�n�� �,zfi�the budget clarifying budget line items versus fund <br />�quests as opposed to funds being conrinually replenished <br />loan programs to keep them self-sustaining; and the need for the <br />to provide resources for its program priorities. <br />�i"��tssion related to t�� Har Mar Apartment project and funding sources, including restricted <br />funds from Ramsey �`ounty provided in the HRA quarterly finance update and setting-aside of <br />those funds over the last three (3) years for use specific to this project and represented as part <br />of the $367,��0 carryover ($100,000 carryover for the last three years) for this project. <br />� provided an example of the HRA levy funding single-family loans several years <br />program became self-sustaining through funds generated from loan paybacks, with <br />tely $200,000 currently in that fund. <br />Mr. Trudgeon asked for a formal vote, if indicated, for the strategic plan update; and requested <br />any additional guidance from the HRA to staff on the preliminaty budget before the HRA's <br />August 31, 2009 meeting and formal recommendarion to the City Council. <br />Motion: Member Majerus moved, seconded by Member Pust to approve the updated <br />`Boseville HRA Strategic Plan 2008 — 2012" (Attachment A) as presented. <br />Discussion ensued related to accepting the strategic plan update without accepring staff's <br />proposed budget, with Mr. Trudgeon advising that the strategic plan was a stand alone <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.