Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, June 16, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />Ms. Larson thanked members for their interest; advising that the City of St. Louis Park was <br />always open to new ideas, opining that best practices are meant to be shared. <br />Chair Maschka concurred, and thanked Ms. Larson for her very informative and thought- <br />provoking presentation. <br />10.Action/Discussion Items <br />a.Discussion of 2010 HRA Programs <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted, in staff’s consideration of topics for discussion between the HRA and <br />City Council at their upcoming meeting, the items accomplished to-date and referenced in the <br />HRA’s Strategic Plan, as well as the 2009 Work Plan, and suggested that timing of another <br />Strategic Planning meeting before this joint meeting may be prudent. Mr. Trudgeon noted the <br />need for the existing documents to provide more long-range goals and guidance; and <br />summarized preliminary discussions held with the HRA’s Finance Sub-Committee as they <br />initiated work on the 2010 Budget. Mr. Trudgeon suggested that this Strategic Planning <br />meeting be held as soon as possible, based on the timing of the joint meeting, and the next <br />regular meeting of the HRA, in addition to the 2010 budget calendar. Mr. Trudgeon assured <br />members that staff was not suggesting reinventing the Strategic Plan, but tweaking it, and <br />taking it to the next level, in order to create an updated work plan for 2010 and beyond, and <br />making sure limited resources were maximized based on refined goals. <br />Member Majerus concurred, opining that now that the Strategic goals were in place, it was <br />time to get into the tactical goals, maintaining the Strategic infrastructure template, and <br />defining a consistent process. <br />Chair Maschka concurred, opining that a good Strategic Plan served as a framework and <br />needed an annual review in order to develop a work plan. <br />Members discussed optional meeting dates/times, with the consensus being that a meeting <br />during the week, rather than on a Saturday during the summer months was preferred, with <br />Wednesday afternoon/evening being the apparent available meeting date. <br />Ms. Kelsey opined that it would be beneficial to have completed an update of the Strategic <br />Plan and Goals prior to the joint HRA/City Council meeting to provide the HRA’s perspective <br />to the City Council on the proposed 2010 direction. <br />Staff suggested use of a facilitator in order to allow staff to fully participate in the discussion, <br />with staff having identified several options for facilitating the meeting and providing a <br />summary report, at a cost not to exceed $2,000, and sought HRA authorization to proceed; and <br />suggested having a Recording Secretary present to provide detailed notes of discussions. <br />Discussion included the merits of having a facilitator present, while not diminishing the desire <br />for staff participation in the discussions, but justifying the expenditure for a facilitator; <br />agreement on having a Recording Secretary available at the meeting to provide detailed <br />discussion notes, from which staff can prepare a summary of goals; and the need for all <br />commissioners, old and those new to the process, to refresh themselves on the Strategic Plan in <br />place. <br />After further discussion, Mr. Trudgeon advised that he could facilitate discussions to some <br />extent, given the apparent reluctance of members to provide a facilitator, and allowing for Ms. <br />Kelsey to be involved in discussions rather than logistics; the need to consider some of those <br />options addressed during Ms. Larson’s presentation earlier tonight, and whether they would <br />work for Roseville; and the need to involve Finance Director Chris Miller in those discussions <br />(i.e., Land Trust, etc.). <br /> <br />