Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Monday, July 27, 2009 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br />  <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />  <br /> <br />7.Public Hearings <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br /> <br />8. Action Items <br /> <br />Commissioner Furnham arrived at this time, approximately 4:50 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />a.Discussion of 2010 Budget <br /> <br />  <br />Strategic Plan Update <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Executive Director Trudgeon noted the draft of staff’s revisions to the Strategic Plan from the <br /> <br />  <br />July 8, 2009 HRA workshop; previously provided to members via e-mail, with no comments <br /> <br /> <br />heard to-date by staff. Mr. Trudgeon noted attempts by staff to link housing areas of the City’s <br /> <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan to the HRA Strategic Plan, with a red-line copy provided to members <br /> <br /> <br />highlighting those revisions. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Members had no comments on the Strategic Plan update. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2010 Preliminary Budget <br />  <br />Mr. Trudgeon presented staff’s “first draft” of a proposed 2010 HRA Budget, incorporating <br /> <br /> <br />those initiatives incorporated into the 2008 – 2012 HRA Strategic Plan applying estimated <br />  <br />numbers to those potential projects. Mr. Trudgeon requested initial comment and review by the <br />  <br />HRA prior to their August 31, 2009 meeting, to allow staff time to prepare final <br />  <br />recommendations to the City Council at their September 14, 2009 regular meeting for adoption <br />  <br />of Preliminary 2010 Budgets and Levies. <br />  <br />  <br />Mr. Trudgeon provided, as a bench handout, comparisons between 2009 and 2010 tax levies <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />and estimated tax impacts, based on a $498,00 proposed 2010 budget. Mr. Trudgeon advised <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />that this represented sixty-three percent (63%) of the allowable maximum RHRA levy, which <br /> <br />  <br />would be $794,315. Mr. Trudgeon noted that this budget was more realistic and more <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />accurately reflected the new Strategic Plan initiatives; and noted that substantial reserves in <br /> <br />  <br />place over the last few budget cycles were no longer available, due to further refinement and <br /> <br /> <br />tracking by staff of HRA funds, both revenue sources and actual expenses for specific <br /> <br /> <br />programs. Mr. Trudgeon further noted that upfront code enforcement activities reduced <br /> <br /> <br />available funding for other HRA activities to some extent. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted staff’s recommendation for continuation of the single-family loan <br /> <br /> <br />program, as well as the abatement assistance program through 2010; and continuation of other <br /> <br /> <br />programs as detailed in the staff report; and including additional training opportunities for <br />  <br />Commissioners as the need arose; as well as incorporating specific line items for phone and <br /> <br /> <br />office supply expenses for better tracking of expenditures. Mr. Trudgeon reviewed the new <br />  <br />programs proposed in the updated Strategic Plan, and as detailed in the staff report. <br />  <br />  <br />Discussion among members and staff included how the $40,000 was identified for marketing <br />  <br />Roseville (“Why Roseville”) with that number representing potential billboard advertising <br />  <br />along I-35W, as well as a large advertising campaign that would include radio time to market <br />  <br />to the entire metropolitan area, rather than as currently done only to Roseville citizens; and <br /> <br /> <br />minimal costs to continue the realtor education program and represented as a separate budget <br /> <br /> <br />line item. <br />  <br /> <br /> <br />Member Masche observed that this doubled levy actually was a function of readjusting the <br />  <br />previous $367,000 cash carryover in the 2009 Budget that had now been spent, and needed to <br /> <br />be replenished with new levy dollars; and actually reflected a more careful review of all <br /> <br />