Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Monday, July 27, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />expenses/revenues over the last few years and more accurately reflected those numbers. Mr. <br />  <br />Masche noted that expenses had not increased to any substantial degree, and in some areas had <br /> <br /> <br />been reduced. <br />  <br /> <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff would continue to monitor case carryovers from tax levy <br /> <br />payments semi-annually, and deferral of various items. Mr. Trudgeon noted the variables in <br /> <br />projecting budgets to meet the September 15, 2009 Preliminary Levy and Budget <br /> <br />requirements, while further changes are anticipated before December’s final levy was due, and <br /> <br />hopefully allowing reduction of preliminary requests based on more information being <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />available at that time. Mr. Trudgeon noted that the preliminary budget could be reduced, but <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />not increased for final adoption. <br /> <br />  <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that it was staff’s intent to make the HRA’s various programs self- <br /> <br />  <br />sustaining as revolving loan funds, as well as enhancing revenue sources (i.e., fees for conduit <br /> <br /> <br />financing requests similar to that of St. Louis Park), as the HRA made those recommendations <br /> <br /> <br />to the City Council for their approval. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Member Pust arrived at this time, approximately 5:07 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Further discussion included how this levy accurately represent services currently being <br /> <br /> <br />provided by the HRA; the need for the HRA to identify program needs on the Strategic Plan <br />  <br />that were in line with their initiatives and priorities; emphasizing the HRA theme for a “hand <br /> <br /> <br />up, not a hand out;” recognition by the City’s external auditing firm of the HRA’s substantial <br />  <br />strides in improving accountability in tracking expenses/revenues in its various funds through <br />  <br />better communication with the City’s Finance Department; and difficulties in using an accrual <br />  <br />rather than cash accounting system in providing periodic reports. <br />  <br />  <br />Additional discussion included ways staff was pursuing to become more cost-effective (i.e., <br />  <br />printing of marketing materials); and automatic carryover of approximately $25.000 in annual <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />reserves. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />  <br />For the benefit of Member Pust, Mr. Trudgeon repeated the background information detailed <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />in the staff report related to this year’s preliminary 2010 budget and levy request, based on the <br /> <br />  <br />updated strategic plan. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Member Pust observed that every $100,000 in expenses represented an approximate 1% levy <br /> <br /> <br />increase; and noted that this preliminary request would indicate a 2.4% levy increase specific <br /> <br /> <br />to the HRA. Member Pust opined that the City Council would count this against the City’s <br /> <br /> <br />total proposed 2010 levy; and that the HRA needed to be prepared with a compelling argument <br /> <br /> <br />to “sell” their rationale for this substantial request to the City Council, when the City Manager <br /> <br /> <br />was considering presenting a zero percent levy. <br />  <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Maschka, and Mr. Trudgeon, noted that this was needed discussion based on the updated <br />  <br />strategic plan and realistic funding to accomplish those initiatives. Chair Maschka noted that a <br />  <br />zero levy increase would remain at $258,000 as in 2009. Mr. Trudgeon anticipated parameters <br />  <br />from the City Council in August, following results of the community meetings currently in <br />  <br />process. <br />  <br />  <br />Councilmember Pust further noted that, over the last six (6) months, departments had cut their <br /> <br /> <br />collective budgets by $400,000 to address recent legislative actions or lack thereof; and <br /> <br /> <br />recognizing another fifteen percent (15%) increase in health care costs, in addition to other <br />  <br />employee-related expenses. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />