My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-08-31_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
2009-08-31_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2010 11:55:36 AM
Creation date
3/18/2010 11:55:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Monday, July 27, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />available for future redevelopment. Mr. Mullins noted that one of the challenges facing the City is that <br />a majority of the community’s housing stock was built in the 1950’s through 1970’s, and that the <br />community was heavily-weighted in one bedroom homes, impacting resale data. Mr. Mullins reviewed <br />that resale data, specific to ramblers and 1-1/2 story homes, representing 70% of all single-family home <br />sales. Mr. Mullins suggested that the City consider pursuing successful ventures for private/public <br />partnerships to assist developers with financial barriers for redevelopment. Mr. Mullins also noted that <br />expanding current rambler housing stock by adding a second story may be prudent for those homes <br />applicable to such remodeling. <br />Based on the findings and challenges/opportunities in the full report, Mr. Mullins suggested that in <br />addressing City development priorities that the City considers: <br />1)Affordable active adult senior housing community – currently no active adult senior housing at this <br />time; <br />2)Affordable family rental housing; <br />3)Market rate general occupancy rental housing (upscale market); <br />4)Availability of Section 8 housing vouchers – only 210 in City right now being issued throughout <br />community – some way to get more vouchers to serve as many as possible. <br />5)Working with existing property owners for rehabilitation/replacement of those buildings – <br />unfortunate deferred maintenance in evidence; <br />6)Owner-occupied (cooperative preferred) active adult senior housing; <br />7)General occupancy for-sale townhomes for entry-level buyers and older adult/senior households; <br />and <br />8)Reassess service-enhanced senior housing needs. <br />Member Pust questioned if there was a standard of Section 8 housing vouchers based on population; <br />with Mr. Mullins responding that there was no magic number; however, opined that 210 was not a <br />substantial number for a community the size of Roseville, and that such housing was always in demand. <br />Mr. Mullins concluded his presentation by reminding members that housing projects attract residents <br />from a wide geography, with 30-40% occupancy from other suburban communities; including adult <br />children moving parent(s) into senior housing within their own community. Mr. Mullins further noted <br />that while there may not appear to be a huge demand for senior housing from Roseville residents, to <br />remember that such housing in an inner-ring suburb would draw from a much wider area. <br />Mr. Mullins noted that a copy of the full report would be forthcoming to the HRA and staff. <br />Discussion included trends for knock down/rebuild housing, with such trends being more prevalent in <br />suburbs such as Edina and St. Louis Park, and other communities initiating ordinances addressing how <br />much square footage was allowable on properties; and reiterated that in the future, additional second- <br />story additions would be in evidence for inner-ring communities for current rambles, for those desiring <br />to remain in their current communities for convenience and/or quality of life issues. <br />Further discussion included whether a need for intergenerational housing was indicated, with Mr. <br />Mullins opining that this type of housing was not being seen to a great extent in MN at this time, and <br />was a more European concept, but would be a great idea for the future. <br />Additional discussion included the rationale for continuing strong marketing and profitability for senior <br />(55 and over) housing, with luxury or rental housing being the concentrated market for for-profit <br />developers; in addition to faith-affiliated senior housing, with many of those faith-based facilities <br />having available land and willing to parcel some of it for senior housing, and also addressing that faith- <br />based mission for serving seniors as they age (i.e., Presbyterian Homes and Ecumen). Mr. Mullins <br />opined that faith-based remained the best private/public partnership for a community, as it subsidized <br />the project via their donation of the land, thereby reducing costs for the housing, and addressing the <br />service from their faith perspective to that senior generation. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.