My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-05-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-05-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 11:55:09 AM
Creation date
3/22/2010 11:54:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/26/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and they could be positioned in the stock pile area to contain the noise. Member <br />Vanderwall suggested the crushing happens during rush hour times to minimize <br />noise. <br />Member Vanderwall moved to recommend approval of the proposal of the site <br />with the following recommendations: <br />1. The City be provided Material Data Safety Sheets for all materials used <br />that require this documentation. <br />2. Recommend working with the Watershed District on a storm water plan <br />for the site that doesn't include infiltration. <br />3. Consider storm water reuse for dust control and tire tracking control with <br />tire wash off system. <br />4. Create a noise control contingency plan that would include back up alarm <br />mitigation. Consider alternative's if allowed by OSHA such as camera <br />systems or lights. The plan would include no banging of truck tailgates. <br />5. The City of Roseville may require a future study of ways to mitigate dust <br />if initial control plan is not effective. <br />Member Stenlund seconded. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried <br />6. Illicit Discharge Storm Water Ordinance <br />Duane Schwartz announced the need to have an ordinance for illicit discharge <br />storm water as a part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program. Member <br />Vanderwall asked to have the word inspect or investigate added to the ordinance. <br />Member DeBenedet asked if the Erosion Control ordinance could be combined <br />with the illicit discharge storm water ordinance into one storm water ordinance. <br />Duane Schwartz stated Erosion Control falls in the zoning ordinance and storm <br />water is Public Works. <br />Member Stenlund suggested having a guide with pictures for the public to know <br />what illicit discharge is. <br />Member DeBenedet mentioned how threatened discharge that presents a danger is <br />defined and how should it be dealt with. Duane Schwartz mentioned the <br />enforcement of this needs to be defined. <br />Member DeBenedet asked to review ordinance at the June meeting. <br />7. Storm Water Treatment Credit Policy Review <br />Duane Schwartz announced a need to determine at what level someone gets a <br />credit for storm water treatment. Member DeBenedet asked is it fair for a new <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.