My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-09-22_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-09-22_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 12:10:22 PM
Creation date
3/22/2010 12:10:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/22/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the future. Duane Schwartz answered we are but that money is not being added to <br />the street infrastructure fund. <br />Member Vanderwall asked if the City Council has this information about street <br />maintenance when they are making decisions about the budget or does the Public <br />Works Environment and Transportation Committee need to give the City Council <br />this information again. Duane Schwartz answered he does not know what the <br />City Council will need for input. <br />Member DeBenedet asked if the 9% increase was the maximum amount under <br />current state law. Duane Schwartz answered the City Council is allowed to levy <br />what they didn't levy in 2009. There are also voter approved levies and police <br />and fire wage increases. The maximum total levy with these exceptions is 14%. <br />Member DeBenedet asked if Public Works received a 9% increase each year, <br />would the department be able to maintain its level of service. Duane Schwartz <br />answered that it would. <br />Member DeBenedet asked if the Public Works Environment and Transportation <br />Committee would have enough time to give the City Council recommendations <br />about street maintenance costs for the budget in October. Duane Schwartz <br />answered the timing would be fine since decisions will not be made until mid to <br />late December. <br />Duane Schwartz mentioned the 9% levy amount is not final. It was set at 9% to <br />leave room for flexibility when reviewing the budget. <br />Member Stenlund asked if traffic control management is an unfunded mandate by <br />the federal government. Duane Schwartz answered yes it is. The City has retro <br />reflectivity standards that need to be met. <br />7. Solid Waste Collection Information <br />Duane Schwartz stated according the report from Fort Collins, CO that was <br />provided in the meeting packet that a large portion of pavement damage comes <br />from waste collection trucks. This study attempted to quantify this by looking at <br />an open collection system. Six solid waste trucks and six recycling trucks caused <br />about 20% of the damage to the pavement. <br />Member Vanderwall mentioned the constant starting and stopping of the <br />collection trucks affects the pavement in different ways also. This affect on the <br />pavement was not mentioned in the report from Fort Collins, CO. Duane <br />Schwartz mentioned the report from Fort Collins, CO does discuss other impacts <br />on both streets and the environment from noise and air quality. <br />Member Vanderwall asked to go over the part of the report that talks about prices <br />per resident. Tim Pratt presented a diagram comparing the prices and services of <br />waste collectors in Roseville with four other cities in Ramsey County. The price <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.