Laserfiche WebLink
Debra Bloom, P.E. <br />City of .Roseville <br />January l5, 2008 <br />Page 22 <br />Under year 2016 build conditions (internal roadway configuration 2}, all but one lcey <br />intersection wilt operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. <br />peak hours with internal roadway configuration 2 and its recommended roadway <br />improvements. <br />a The fallowing roadway improvements are necessary to achieve the level of service <br />operations in the previous bullet: <br />Cleveland Avenue at County Road D <br />• Construct a northbound left-turn lane <br />• Construct an eastbound left-tern lane <br />• Operate intersection with north-south split-phasing <br />Cleveland Avenue at County Rpad C2 <br />s Install a traffic signal <br />Cleveland Avenue at I-35W Northbound Ram s <br />• 1/xtend the existing southbound left-turn lane <br />Due to the physical constraints near the intersection of County Road ClFairview <br />Avenue (railroad line immediately south, high-voltage power line structures <br />immediately south and existing developments in the northwest and northeast <br />quadrants}, there are no minor improvements that can implemented to obtain <br />acceptable operations. Ahhnugh only one intersection operates unacceptably, internal <br />roadway configuration 2 includes an incomplete roadway system. Future plans for <br />increased redevelopment in this area (subarea I, II and III) dictate the need to <br />establish a strong internal roadway network. <br />• Under year 2016 build conditions (internal roadway configuration 3}, all key intersections <br />will operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with <br />inten~al roadway configuration 3 and the roadway improvements Iisted at this point. In <br />addition, the roundabouts along Twin Lakes Parkway will operate acceptably under this final <br />year 2016 scenario. <br />• For comparison purposes, we have reviewed the Twin Lakes AUAR Update scenario C versus <br />the proposed and adjacent McGough development study assumptions (the comparison <br />includes the entire Twin Lakes AUAR redevelopment area -subareas I, II and III). The <br />Twin Lakes AUAR Update scenario C has the potential to generate 4,734 trips during the p.m. <br />peak hour. A modif ed scenario C containing the land use assumptions presented in this <br />current study will generate 5,194 trips during the p.m. peak hour (460 more p.m. peak hour <br />trips}. <br />