My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-03-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2008
>
2008-03-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2010 12:26:03 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 10:04:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/25/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Roseville <br />March, 2008 <br />VII. Recommendations for next steps <br />The flow data Collected during 2007 generally provided some background information and response data <br />for a limited storm event following a very dry summer period. We would recommend conducting additional <br />flow metering in several locations. 1) A new location should be identified to estimate the flow from Area A. <br />2) Area D should be subdivided into three areas. 3) Two or three temporary meters should be installed on the <br />MCES interceptors to subdivide the MCES line as well as estimate flows from the currently un-metered areas, <br />We would also recommend calibrating the lift station pumps at lift stations 4, 5, 9 and 13 to supplement the <br />flow data available from the temporary meters. The Fernwood Lift Station (#13) is located within the area of <br />temporary meter D. <br />Table 7 includes a summary of typical Ill sources, investigative procedures that are designed to identify <br />these sources, and rehabilitation options typically associated with the particular source. This is not an <br />exhaustive list but can be considered a guide for the next steps in the Ill identification and rehabilitation <br />process. <br />Table 7 -Summa of T ical I/I Source, Investi ation Procedures, and Rehabilitation 0 tions <br />Infiltration Potential Source Investigative Procedures Rehabilitation Options <br />or Inflow <br />Inflow Manhole Covers Smoke Test Replace Cover <br /> Physical Survey Raise Cover <br /> Seal Cover Rim Area <br />Inflow Area Drains Smoke Test Re-route flow to storm sewer or surface <br /> dischar e <br />Inflow Roof Drains Building lnspection Re-route flow to storm sewer or surface <br /> Smoke Test discharge <br /> D e Test <br />Infiltration/ peteriorated Adjustment Manhole Inspection Replace rings and seal <br />Inflow Rings Install sealing product (Chimney seal, Infi- <br /> shield) <br />Infiltration/ Sump Pump Connection Basement Inspection Re-route discharge out of basement to <br />Inflow surface <br />Infiltration/ Direct Foundation Drains TV inspection of service pipe Re-route to sump pump and discharge <br />Inflow outside basement to surface <br />Infiltration/ leaking Service pipe TV inspection of service pipe Replace service pipe <br />Inflow Install CIPP Liner <br />Infiltration Manhole wall seepage Manhole Inspection Grout Injection <br /> Replace Manhole <br /> Install Manhole Liner <br />Infiltration Pipe Joint Leakage Televise sewer main Joint Grouting <br /> CIPP Lining <br /> Pi e Re facement <br />In the Meter Areas D and H initial investigation efforts should be focused on possible private property type <br />sources. Investigation should include sump pump surveys of individual properties and televising individual <br />service lines during wet conditions, Some communities have had reasonable success televising the service lines <br />from the main sewer using a remote camera. This process is less expensive and significantly less intrusive than <br />attempting to televise services from the basement of a property. In consideration of the potential problems <br />with basement access, we would recommend attempting to televise several service lines in several areas of <br />these service areas to test the procedure and view the results prior to widespread implementation of a <br />program. Since sump pump inspections can be a difficult project and the cost implications can be significant, <br />the program should be implemented throughout the entire community with priority areas defined by the <br />identified inflow areas. <br />In the Meter Areas B, D, E, F, and G initial investigative efforts should be focused on direct inflow sources, <br />with smoke testing some suspect areas, physical survey of manholes, roof leader inspections, and dye testing <br />Page 10 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.