My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-07-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2008
>
2008-07-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2010 2:25:00 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 12:02:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/22/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ©~ <br />~® <br />Roe said that even though the traffic analysis model could not include $5 per gallon gas, the <br />Comp Plan could contain language and/or policies regarding the impacts of increasing gas prices <br />on the City's transportation planning. <br />Goedeke feels that the new County Road 62 bridge over I-35W is not adequately used and <br />asked whether there is potential to develop a connection to Highway 280. <br />Bloom explained the current planning that is occurring around Highway 280 based on a recent <br />meeting with Mn DOT. <br />Shwiff asked about the status of the existing park & ride at Rosedale. <br />Radel explained that the new owners of Rosedale are not interested in continuing the park & ride <br />function at Rosedale, so this park & ride will be discontinued in 2011. <br />Public Works Director Schwartz explained that Metro Transit projects a need for 800 park & ride <br />spaces in Roseville. They are currently looking at developing two facilities to meet this projected <br />need, including 400 spaces at Twin Lakes and 400 spaces at a to-be-determined site somewhere <br />along Highway 36 in eastern Roseville. <br />Shwiff suggested that the City should be identifying any potential transit "golden opportunities". <br />Schwartz responded that Metro Transit is currently looking for additional opportunities for <br />developing park & rides. <br />Schaffer briefly described a metro counties tax that is intended to be available for funding future <br />park & ride ramps. <br />Goedeke said that he is shocked that Rosedale is moving away from its support of a park & ride <br />lot at Rosedale. He recommended that the City be very persistent in trying to retain this park & <br />ride lot. <br />Bakeman suggested that the proposed park & ride lot should be designed with the capacity to be <br />converted to a more full-service transit hub in the future. <br />Ihlan described how existing I-35W northbound cut-through traffic impacts the area immediately <br />east of I-35W using County Road C and Fairview Ave or Snelling Ave. She is concerned that <br />adding Twin Lakes Parkway will create an even more direct east-west connection from I-35W to <br />Fairview Ave and Snelling Ave. <br />Grefenberg asked about planning for non-motorized transportation options and whether Snelling <br />Ave is designated as a bus rapid transit (BRT) corridor. He recommended that the Comp Plan <br />clearly identify Snelling Ave as a transit corridor. <br />Schaffer asked why planned new streets in the Twin Lakes area are essentially the only <br />improvements showing up in the Capital Improvements Program when Twin Lakes Parkway will <br />just create a new pass-through route. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.