My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-02-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-02-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2010 2:21:32 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 2:18:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/24/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Set-out rate b~- # of Set out rate Set out rate After bin <br />neigE~borE,ood households before after outreach delivery increase <br /> outreach in set-out <br />Neighborhood #I 162 19% 20% 28% 47% <br />Neighborhood #2 $25 19% 21% 26% 36% <br />Nei hborhood #3 294 17% 24% 24`% 41'% <br />Control: 41.5 17`% I7% I5% - 11 <br />Neighborhood #4 {no outreach.) (no bin <br />(no outreach) delive } <br />Ner~hborhnod #3 af~zd #4 are adjacent ar~td brave the sattze dem.o~raph~res. <br />Participation rate results: The participation rate is the number of households who set <br />out materials for recycling collection at least once over a period of time, in this case one <br />month. The participation rate was higher in the neighborhoods that received outreach <br />versus the control neighborhood that did not receive outreach. <br />`Partici ~tion rated neighborhoad <br />., ... Partici ation rate <br />Neighborhood #1 43% <br />Nei hborhood #2 44%~ <br />Neighborhood #3 45% <br />Cantral: Neighborhood #4 (no outreach) 36% <br />Nergdil~nrJzond #3 and #4 are adjacer~zt and have the same de-~iin~raphr~cs, <br />New Materials Education Recommendations for 2009 <br />For decades, the aluminum, steel, newspaper, and plastics industries heavily supported <br />recycling education efforts. Today, paper, bottles and cans are considered "traditional" <br />recycling items by every recycler and are the most common items you will f nd in <br />recycling bins across the county. These industries laid the foundation for recycling in the <br />1980s and 1990s. Now, with a commitment to education, new materials can be added to <br />well-established recycling programs. <br />Any new product or material Chat is added to a recycling program must play catch-up in <br />order for recyclers to understand what to recycle, how to recycle it, anal to incorporate <br />this "new" material into their typical recycling routine. Along-tet-tii investil~ent in <br />education is required to build the knowledge that a new material can be recycled. <br />Tetra Pak has shown a commitment in two major areas that are essential for building milk <br />carton and juice box recycling. market development to ensure their product can be used by <br />paper mills to make new products and educatrort to ensure recyclers put these materials at <br />the curb. Over the past t~vo years, Tetra Pak has begun the essential anal necessary <br />education that will be needed to make milk cartons and juice boxes common items to <br />recycle. Eureka Recycling has identified areas where Tetra Pak can focus its future <br />education efforts to most efficiently and cost-effectively increase milk carton and juice box <br />recycling. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.