My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-05-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-05-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2010 3:02:38 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 2:29:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/26/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
emanate from the raw asphalt or product prior to its shipping, rather than <br />from the stack itself. Ms. Henderson opined that typically, those odors <br />would be short-term, and would shift with prevailing winds, making them <br />dift-icult to identify. <br />Mr. Peterson noted that their Minneapolis plant operated on two acres of <br />land, north of Lake Street off Cedar Avenue, with an apartment. building <br />immediately adjacent to the property; and that they had never received any <br />complaints of smoke or odor. <br />Mr. Kittleson. noted that the 1Vlinneapolis plant operated on a "wet-wash <br />system," and was not nearly as efficient as the proposed system in <br />Roseville; with this plant proposed as warm rather than hot mix, providing <br />for cleaner operations. <br />Ms. Henderson advised that data predicting a scope for emissions <br />traveling from a stationary site were not a typical request or requirement <br />of the regulatory body in the permitting process. <br />Further discussion included the height. of the stacks, estimated to be 70' or <br />below; explanation by the applicant of the process for collection of <br />materials from old roads and how it was crushed and recycled into a <br />usable size and elements blended at the plant with virgin aggregate from <br />quarries in the metropolitan area; transfer of gravel from a pit in Inver <br />Grove Heights and aggregates from suppliers (limestone) from Burnsville <br />and other sources by truck, and hopefully by a rail spur on site. <br />Councilmember Pust sought clarification for the company's preference to <br />locate in Roseville. <br />Mr. Peterson advised that economic considerations indicated a preference <br />to work within a 15 mile radius of the plant, and within their market area, <br />providing asphalt paving for major highway construction projects in the <br />area, but most work consisting of parking lots, driveway contractors and <br />City streets. <br />Nir. Kittleson advised that the company had a good client base in <br />metropolitan. inner-city suburbs, and that they hoped to be in the City for <br />the long-term, and to be a good corporate neighbor and blend into the <br />community. <br />Mayor Klausing refocused discussion on the request before the City <br />Council as the asphalt plant itself was a permitted use in this industrial <br />zoning district. Mayor Klausing suggested that, at the Council's <br />preference, a future discussion of permitted uses under City Code may be <br />appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.