My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-07-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-07-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2010 2:36:32 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 2:35:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/28/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Duane Schwartz talked about another project that is out for bid right now for TH <br />280 Lift Station PaCal site connecting to Lauderdale. <br />Duane Schwartz mentioned the Shoreview Green Community awards. There <br />were eight total applicants, two applicants were from Roseville. There will be a <br />self guided tour on August 1st and 2"d <br />5. Topics for June 29, 2009 Joint City Council / PWETC Discussion <br />Member DeBenedet asked to verify the time of the meeting. Duane Schwartz <br />answered the meeting will start around 6:15pm. <br />Duane Schwartz stated the City Council wants a list of topics before the meeting. <br />Topics that were mentioned at a previous meeting were: <br />• Organized waste collection <br />• Trail and path funding <br />• Financial Policy related to assessments <br />Member Vanderwall mentioned the topic of long term funding for infrastructure. <br />Member DeBenedet stated this is an adequate maintenance effort as an ongoing <br />investment to preserve infrastructure in the most cost effective manor. Member <br />Vanderwall stated this should be applied to not only street projects but also other <br />things like sewer. <br />Member Stenlund suggested to go along with this topic to look at was done in the <br />past year for infrastructure. <br />Member Stenlund suggested the topic of asking the City Council what roll is for <br />the PWET Commission and are there standards for how the commission should <br />operate. <br />Member Vanderwall stated he was concerned about taking too much time in the <br />meeting going over what was done in the past year. <br />Member Vanderwall suggested the topic of how the Twin Lakes project is a form <br />of payback. Member DeBenedet stated the City Council is more involved in this <br />project than the commission is because of the financial aspect so this may not be a <br />good topic to discuss at the Joint Meeting. <br />Member Vanderwall suggested a topic to discuss with the City Council would be <br />the Highway 36 and Rice Street interchange layout recommendations dealing with <br />the pathway. <br />Member Vanderwall also suggested the topics of the Twin Lakes Storm Water <br />Management design and erosion control ordinance control and enforcement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.