Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville, Minnesota <br />September $, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />• The allocation of supplies ar~d materials and other services and charges are based on the best <br />judgment of Springsted's consulting learn and the City's department heads, These costs represent a <br />smaller portion than the personnel-related costs so the accuracy of the service costs is dependent to a <br />lesser extent on the accuracy of these costs. <br />The costs identified for each service within each department reflects the budgeted cost to provide that <br />particular service. However, it would not be accurate to say that choosing not to provide a particular <br />service in the future would result in a corresponding cost sa~~ings equal to the cost of that service. This <br />results because the employees in each department provide a large number of services. For example; the <br />cost of plowing snow by the Public Works Department was determined to be ~ 123,730, The personnel <br />costs associated with snow plowing are $47,503; however the employees who plow snow also provide <br />street maintenance and repair, tree trimming, building and grounds maintenance, right-of-way <br />maintenance, maintenance of streetscapes, and other services. The decision to not continue to provide a <br />particular service, or to provide less of that service, needs to be examined in the context of how that <br />would affect the other services provided by the same employees. However, the allocation of time and <br />expenses developed by this study provides the City with a tool to understand this context and to make <br />informed decisions. <br />The budgeted costs allocated to services are direct costs only and do not capture the personnel costs <br />associated with vacation, sick leave, holidays and other non service-related time. Other non service- <br />related time includes tune spent in administ-ative support and otF-er activities that cannot be allocated to <br />any particular service. Therefore, the cost allocated to services in each department does not equal the <br />total budget amount for that department. <br />Administration Services <br />Eleven services were identified within Administration as shown in the table on the next page. Three <br />services account for app~'oximately 73.3cIc. of the service costs budgeted in Administration. Legal services <br />account for approximately 34.3~Io, City Council approximately 22.7"I~, and Personnel Management <br />approximately 1b.3~c. <br />Two services utilize approximately 58.7~1~ of the FTEs time allocated to services. These are customer <br />citizen support utilizing approximately 3 J .2~/c and personnel management utilizing approximately 27.5`7c. <br />Other services and charges make up approximately 54.7% of the cost of services budgeted, primaril}~ <br />because the cast of legal services is in this category. Personal Services make up approximately 44.9`I~ of <br />the costs of services budgeted while supplies and materials make up approximately 0.4%. Administration <br />services are shown ire the table that follows, <br />