2009-09-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Review of Trash Collection Impacts / Work with haulers to develop appropriate and effective safety specifications for all new vehicles (e.g., rear and side strobe lights) and a timeline for retrofitting existing vehicles as a condition of the hauler license (see Appendix A for sample contract language}; / Require haulers to participate in City sponsored/initiated "Slow Down to Get Around" safety campaign; and / Implement a Districted Collection System or City-Wide Contract for Services to minimize vehicle miles traveled: o Require fully-automated vehicles; o Require vehicles to have appropriate optional safety equipment; and o Establish safety incentives (e.g., sliding scale profit ratio based on safety record). other Vehicle Street Maintenance f mpacts As part of the analysis of trash truck impacts we evaluated the impacts of trash trucks relative to other types of vehicles, including delivery trucks and buses. Table 3 below provides a comparison of the average ESAL's for the various vehicle types noted22 to the estimated ESAL's of residential trash and recycling trucks operating in the City. The impacts are also presented in Passenger Car Equivalents. Table 3 CCtMPARISON OF TRASH ANDQTH~R VI=WICLE IMPACTS Vehicle Type Number of ESAL Factor Passenger Car General Classification AA5HT0 Classi#ication Axles t+~ Equivalents Cars Passenger Cars 2 0.0008 1 VanslPickups - Other 2-Ax1e14-Tire Trucks 2 OA052 7 Large Pickups 1 Delivery Vans Panel and Pickup Trucks 3 0.0722 15 Large Delivery Trucks 3 or More Axle Trucks 3 0.1303 163 Local Delivery Trucks 2-Ax1e16-Tire Trucks 2 0.1890 236 Residential Recycling Trucks 2 0.219U 274 Buses Buses 2 or 3 0.6806 851 Residential Trash Trucks -3 1:0230 1,279 Long Maul Semi-Trailers Various Classifications 3 - 5+ 1.1264 1,408 ~3 zz Based an sample data reported by American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. Section 2 - 20