My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-09-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-09-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2010 3:18:40 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 2:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/22/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review of Trash <br />Collection <br />Impacts <br />/ Work with haulers to develop appropriate and effective <br />safety specifications for all new vehicles (e.g., rear and <br />side strobe lights) and a timeline for retrofitting existing <br />vehicles as a condition of the hauler license (see Appendix <br />A for sample contract language}; <br />/ Require haulers to participate in City sponsored/initiated <br />"Slow Down to Get Around" safety campaign; and <br />/ Implement a Districted Collection System or City-Wide <br />Contract for Services to minimize vehicle miles <br />traveled: <br />o Require fully-automated vehicles; <br />o Require vehicles to have appropriate optional <br />safety equipment; and <br />o Establish safety incentives (e.g., sliding scale profit <br />ratio based on safety record). <br />other Vehicle Street Maintenance f mpacts <br />As part of the analysis of trash truck impacts we evaluated the <br />impacts of trash trucks relative to other types of vehicles, including <br />delivery trucks and buses. Table 3 below provides a comparison <br />of the average ESAL's for the various vehicle types noted22 to the <br />estimated ESAL's of residential trash and recycling trucks <br />operating in the City. The impacts are also presented in <br />Passenger Car Equivalents. <br />Table 3 <br />CCtMPARISON OF TRASH ANDQTH~R VI=WICLE IMPACTS <br />Vehicle Type <br />Number of <br />ESAL Factor Passenger <br /> <br />Car <br />General Classification AA5HT0 Classi#ication Axles t+~ Equivalents <br />Cars Passenger Cars 2 0.0008 1 <br />VanslPickups - Other 2-Ax1e14-Tire Trucks 2 OA052 7 <br />Large Pickups 1 Delivery Vans Panel and Pickup Trucks 3 0.0722 15 <br />Large Delivery Trucks 3 or More Axle Trucks 3 0.1303 163 <br />Local Delivery Trucks 2-Ax1e16-Tire Trucks 2 0.1890 236 <br />Residential Recycling Trucks 2 0.219U 274 <br />Buses Buses 2 or 3 0.6806 851 <br />Residential Trash Trucks -3 1:0230 1,279 <br />Long Maul Semi-Trailers Various Classifications 3 - 5+ 1.1264 1,408 <br />~3 <br />zz Based an sample data reported by American Association of State <br />Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guide for Design of <br />Pavement Structures. <br />Section 2 - 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.